Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms
Abstract
Why do firms form strategic alliances? The traditional theoretical answer has been transaction cost explanations. Yet, these explanations which center on transaction characteristics, static efficiency, and routine situations do not capture the strategic and social factors which propel many firms into alliance formation. In this study, however, we combine these alternative social and strategic explanations for alliance formation. Consistent with these explanations, we find that alliances form when firms are in vulnerable strategic positions either because they are competing in emergent or highly competitive industries or because they are attempting pioneering technical strategies. We also find that alliances form when firms are in strong social positions such that they are led by large, experienced, and well-connected top management teams. The underlying logic of alliance formation is, thus, strategic needs and social opportunities. We develop these findings by extending the resource-based view of the firm to alliance formation and then examining the resulting hypotheses using product development alliances. The study is longitudinal and focuses on entrepreneurial semiconductor firms. Overall, strategic and social explanations of organizational phenomena as well as industry, firm, and top management team factors emerge as central in the paper. This suggests that these factors are relevant for predicting alliance formation, especially in high-velocity industries such as semiconductors. We conclude that failure to include social and strategic explanations creates an impoverished view of alliance formation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The principal benefits of networking identified in the literature include pooling complementary skills.
“pooling complementary skills (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996;Hagedoorn and Duysters, 2002);”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996
Cites
Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives
Williamson, O. E. (1991) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393356 · Cited by 7,151 · see citing works
A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Hennart, J. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090406 · Cited by 1,843 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.1255632 · Cited by 12,416 · see citing works
“In other instances potential partners may simply lack the relational capability or the relation-building skills and process skills necessary to employ effective governance mechanisms, make relation-specific investments, or develop knowledge-sharing routines ( Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Larson, 1992).”
BackgroundIs the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?
Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011928 · Cited by 4,461 · see citing works
Boards of Directors and Firm Performance: Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives
Hillman, A., & Dalziel, T. (2003) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196729 · Cited by 4,092 · see citing works
Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer
Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171108 · Cited by 3,570 · see citing works
“1988; Hagedoorn and Schakenraad, 1990; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996 ).”
A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances
Das, T., & Teng, B.-S. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600105 · Cited by 2,939 · see citing works
“The few studies that have applied the resource-based perspective to strategic alliances cover only limited aspects (e.g., Blodgett, 1991; Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Kogut, 1988; Mowery, Oxley, & Silverman, 1998; Rouse & Daellenbach, 1999; Tyler & Steensma, 1995, 1998; Varadarajan & Cunningham,…”
BackgroundSOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.183 · Cited by 2,841 · see citing works
“Although young firms often seek to establish links with ther firms in order to enhance their reputation and image (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Hitt et al., 2000), the learning benefits of such exposure are also important.”
BackgroundGulati, R. (1999) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199905)20:5 · Cited by 2,482 · see citing works
Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective
Brass, D., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H., & Tsai, W.-P. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159624 · Cited by 2,561 · see citing works
“Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996) found that firms with large top management teams, or with top managers who were also employed by other industry employers, or with top managers who were higher ranking executives in other firms were more likely to form strategic alliances.”
Backgroundowen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2004) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0054 · Cited by 2,368 · see citing works
“…Uzzi 1996), interlocking affiliations among corporations (Mizruchi 1992, Davis et al. 2003), or formal, contractually defined, strategic alliances (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996, Powell et al. 1996), networks are an essential component of markets because they channel and direct flows of…”
BackgroundCarpenter, M., Geletkanycz, M., & Sanders, W. G. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001 · Cited by 2,309 · see citing works
“Thus,Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996)were among the first to document a relationship between social aspects of executive demography and firm strategy.”
BackgroundNetwork-based research in entrepreneurship
Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(02)00081-2 · Cited by 2,302 · see citing works
“The work of Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996) suggests that the market context in which a new venture is immersed explains differences in the networking 7 These results should be reconciled with the work of Dodd (1997) who found that entrepreneurs did not report belonging to social groups at a…”
ResultTHE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE OF INTERCONNECTED FIRMS: AN EXTENSION OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW.
Lavie, D. (2002) · doi:10.5465/apbpp.2002.7516490 · Cited by 2,297
A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions
Ireland, R., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. (2003) · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00086-2 · Cited by 2,165
“Thus, competition—in the form of competitive strategy, benchmarking, learning to consistently outperform competitors, strategic position, and so forth—forms the basis of many strategic management perspectives (Ei enhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundInterorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i
Stuart, T. E. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200008)21:8 · Cited by 2,017 · see citing works
Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002 · Cited by 1,993 · see citing works
“…of developing innovation in conjunction with external, oftentimes larger partners proposes that especially new and small firms rarely have the resources and capabilities to respond to the innovation demands at any given time (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Jarillo, 1989; Yli-Renko et al., 2001).”
BackgroundA Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances
Grant, R., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x · Cited by 1,936 · see citing works
“Drawing upon resourcedependence theory (Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978) and the resource-based view of the firm (Penrose, 1957), several studies (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Gulati, 1999; Rothaermel, 2001; Van De Ven and Walker, 1984) have viewed alliances as a quest for resources.”
MethodNetworking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
“…to new markets and technologies (Grandori and Soda, 1995); speeding products to market (Almeida and Kogut, 1999); pooling complementary skills (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Hagedoorn and Duysters, 2002); safeguarding property rights when complete or contingent contracts are not possible…”
Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility
Rosenkopf, L., & Almeida, P. (2003) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.6.751.16026 · Cited by 1,721 · see citing works
“Empirical studies of alliance formation assume that search for new capabilities and strategic interdependencies within limited social contexts drive partner selection (e.g., Gulati 1995, Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996 ).”
BackgroundReinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model
London, T., & Hart, S. (2004) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400099 · Cited by 1,616 · see citing works
“Collaborating with non-traditional partners: understanding the social context Ventures facing challenging new environments usually need to turn to partner organizations for missing resources and expertise ( Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996 ).”
BackgroundThe evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm
Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.156 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M., Levitas, E., Arrégle, J., & Borza, A. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/1556404 · Cited by 1,522 · see citing works
Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage
Ireland, R., Hitt, M., & Deepa, V. (2002) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630202800308 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Founders' human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view
Colombo, M., & Grilli, L. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010 · Cited by 1,397 · see citing works
“Previous studies (see for instance,McGee et al., 1995; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Stuart et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2001) suggest that alliances with larger corporations may provide NTBFs with access to much needed complementary commercial assets (i.e., sale force, brand name, customer care,…”
ResultInterorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach
Faems, D., Looy, B. V., & Debackere, K. (2005) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00120.x · Cited by 1,291 · see citing works
Reuber, A., & Fischer, E. (1997) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490120 · Cited by 1,288 · see citing works
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264 · see citing works
Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis
Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00159-2 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective
Das, T., & Teng, B.-S. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.1.77.12570 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
“, Franko 197 la, Kogut 1988) attribute the instability of joint ventures to the tensions between parent firms, and between parent firms and the ventures. According to Kogut (1989), because competitive incentives among the partners and a lack of reciprocity are at odds with interfirm cooperation, joint ventures tend to…”
BackgroundLocal search and the evolution of technological capabilities
Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171004 · Cited by 1,202 · see citing works
Paulraj, A., Lado, A. A., & Chen, I. J. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.04.001 · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
“Additionally, firms may form strategic partnerships to access or acquire unique and valuable resources that they lack, or leverage ‘‘social’’ resources, such as reputation, status, and legitimacy (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundConstructing Markets and Shaping Boundaries: Entrepreneurial Power in Nascent Fields
Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43669892 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
“Much of this work centers on single-boundary decisions using resource dependence and social network logics (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Gulati & Higgins, 2003), but a few studies examine entrepreneurs as they form holistic patterns of ties.”
BackgroundSelf-citationStuart, T. E. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393679 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
“Because they have more employees, larger firms may have wider-reaching industry contacts, leading to more extensive personnel networks and greater knowledge of alliance opportunities (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundThe Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization
Simonin, B. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256930 · Cited by 1,089 · see citing works
Board Characteristics and Audit Fees
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1506/chwk-gmq0-mlke-k03v · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL
Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, A. M., & Sarkar, M. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/20159599 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
“Researchers pursuing a related stream of research have focused on knowledge transfer from a recipient organization's perspective and investigated knowledge diffusion and the interorganizational social structure created by executive migration (Aldrich & Pfeffer, 1976; Boeker, 1997).”
BackgroundWhich ties matter when? the contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success
Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.287 · Cited by 1,036 · see citing works
Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance
Chen, I. J., Paulraj, A., & Lado, A. A. (2004) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002 · Cited by 1,013 · see citing works
“Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996) argue that firms enter into strategic partnerships either to gain access to or acquire unique and valuable resources that they lack, or to leverage ‘‘social’’ resources, such as reputation, status, and legitimacy.”
BackgroundMalhotra, A., Gosain, S., & El Sawy, O. A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148671 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Resources, Transactions and Rents: Managing Value Through Interfirm Collaborative Relationships
Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.326 · Cited by 981 · see citing works
“Both TC (Williamson 1991, Balakrishnan and Koza 1993, Hennart 1988, 1991) and RB (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996, Hamel et al. 1989) arguments have been used independently as a basis for furthering understanding of collaborations between firms.”
BackgroundCausation and effectuation processes: A validation study
Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006 · Cited by 924 · see citing works
The Scope and Governance of International R&D Alliances
Oxley, J., & Sampson, R. C. (2004) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.398320 · Cited by 924
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B.-J. (2009) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2009.00273.x · Cited by 829 · see citing works
“External vulnerability can arise if new competitors are entering the market or if the firm itself is trying pioneering technologies (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996).”
BackgroundA Resource-Based View of Product Development
Verona, G. (1999) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1580445 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective
Dacin, M., Oliver, C., & Roy, J.-P. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.577 · Cited by 810 · see citing works
Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118 · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate Relationships
Katila, R., Rosenberger, J. D., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.2.295 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
“For example, although not specific about the desired resources, scholars studying new firms show that these firms form ties with established firms when they depend on them for resources (Shan, 1990; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Ozcan and Eisenhardt, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationThe Two Facets of Collaboration: Cooperation and Coordination in Strategic Alliances
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., & Zhelyazkov, P. (2012) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.691646 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
“…are likely to consider not only prospective partners resource endowments to ensure complementary contributions that promise high payoffs ways (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978), but also try to assess their integrity, reputation, and likely commitment to the…”
BackgroundA critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda
Alvedalen, J., & Boschma, R. (2017) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694 · Cited by 755 · see citing works
“(Cooke, 2016; Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996) This requires a dynamic network approach to EE which is still lacking (Ter Wal & Boschma, 2011).”
BackgroundAntecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource‐based theory perspective
Barratt, M., & Oke, A. (2007) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.003 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
“…chain management research, with Rungtusanatham et al. (2003) suggesting that linkages represent a form of inter‐firm relationship and that RBT has been used multiple times to investigate such relationships (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Mowery et al., 1996; Lorenzoni and Lipparini, 1999).”
BackgroundThe Embeddedness of Organizations: Dialogue & Directions
Dacin, M., Ventresca, M. J., & Beal, B. D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500304 · Cited by 701 · see citing works
“…perspective, focusing on the structural dimensions of networks and social systems (Burt, 1982; White, 1981), as well as a more recent focus on content and process of exchange relations (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Gulati, 1995a, 1995b; Uzzi, 1996, 1997; Uzzi & Gillespie, 1999a, 1999b).”
BackgroundHagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00287 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
“As far as questions about the industry (environment) versus company (strategy) effects are concerned, our study supports those approaches that stress the relevance of both company-specific and environmental factors (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundResultBerchicci, L. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Making a Difference: Organization as Design
Romme, G. (2003) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Social capital, knowledge, and the international growth of technology-based new firms
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Tontti, V. (2002) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/s0969-5931(01)00061-0 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy
Mazzucato, M. (2016) · Innovation Systems, Policy and Management · doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
The resource based theory: dissemination and main trends
Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., & Galán, J. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.532 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
“This is the case with the documents that analyze organizational relations and relational rents (Dyer, 1996; Dyer and Singh, 1998; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundStrategies for managing a portfolio of alliances
Hoffmann, W. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.607 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Tsang, E. W. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.251 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
The Strategic Management of Innovation: A Systematic Review and Paths for Future Research
Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2011) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00321.x · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix ☆
Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Welpe, I. (2006) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.004 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Ritala, P. (2001) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00741.x · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries
Whittington, K. B., Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2009) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.90 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
“…informal affi liations among corporations (Mizruchi, 1992; Davis, Yoo, and Baker, 2003), or contractual alliances that formally link organizations (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr, 1996), networks have been shown to play a key role in shaping both knowledge fl ows…”
BackgroundTrying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona
Danneels, E. (2011) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.863 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Stacking the deck: the effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2005) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.495 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Sine, W., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20785590 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
“Similarly to Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996) and Baron et al. (1999), we found that founding team size had a positive effect on future revenue.”
BackgroundExperience-Based Human Capital and Social Capital of Outside Directors
Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308321551 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
“Prior positions in different firms in the focal industry increases the number of links that directors have developed with various industry players, which then creates more leads for the focal firm (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996).”
Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2932 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
Success Factors of Strategic Alliances in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises—An Empirical Survey
Hoffmann, W., & Schlosser, R. (2001) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(01)00041-3 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Street, C., & Cameron, A. (2007) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2007.00211.x · Cited by 540 · see citing works
“External factors such as environmental conditions of uncertainty (Weaver, Dickson, and Gibson 1997) and market conditions of high competition (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996) force small companies to look for larger partners.”
BackgroundLeiblein, M., Reuer, J., & Dalsace, F. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.259 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
“Prior research has measured technological performance as a function of a primary indicator of transistor density, the line width, or feature size, at which information is etched onto a semiconductor circuit (e.g., Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; West and Iansiti, 1998).”
BackgroundCompeting with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q.-H. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2015.15468abstract · Cited by 536 · see citing works
“…to the literature on inter-organizational relationships, much of which again emphasizes positive outcomes for firms involved in such ties (e.g., Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996; Rothaermel 2001, 2002; Gulati and Higgins 2003; Gulati et al. 2009) and the role of hub firms in creating value in…”
Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs
Aragón-Sánchez, A., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2005) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2005.00138.x · Cited by 531 · see citing works
“In this sense, by relying on the resource-based approach, together with the literature focused on the study of SMEs’ competitiveness, it seems reasonable to study management characteristics—representing intangible resources and capabilities—that may be fundamental for their competitiveness: technological resources and…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Influence of National Culture on the Formation of Technology Alliances by Entrepreneurial Firms
Steensma, H., Marino, L. D., Weaver, K., & Dickson, P. (2000) · doi:10.5465/1556421 · Cited by 530
Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation
Rothaermel, F., & Boeker, W. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.634 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
“Social networks have been found to be reliable predictors of alliance formation in prior studies across different industries and time frames (Podolny, 1994; Gulati, 1995b; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Ahuja, 2000; Chung et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultHsu, L.-C., & Wang, C.-H. (2012) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00718.x · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Roles of Social Capital in Venture Creation: Key Dimensions and Research Implications*
Liao, J., & Welsch, H. P. (2005) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-627x.2005.00141.x · Cited by 512 · see citing works
“Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven (1996) noted that new”
BackgroundAlliance Portfolios: A Review and Research Agenda
Wassmer, U. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308328484 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
“…of why firms form strategic alliances are manifold: to access new valuable resources from partners (Chung et al., 2000; Das & Teng, 2000; Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Lavie, 2006), to reduce transaction costs (Kogut, 1988), to learn from a partner (Inkpen, 2000; Kogut, 1988), to deal…”
BackgroundIssues of Research Design and Construct Measurement in Entrepreneurship Research: The past Decade
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2001) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225870102500407 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Venture Capitalists and Cooperative Start-up Commercialization Strategy
Hsu, D. H. (2004) · Management Sciences · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0480 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
“Hellmann and Puri (2000), for example, find that among a sample of technology-based start-ups in Silicon Valley, those funded by VCs brought their products to market faster.”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis
Cantner, U., & Graf, H. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.002 · Cited by 480 · see citing works
Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance
Lavie, D., & Miller, S. R. (2008) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0341 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations
Bogers, M. (2010) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/14601061111104715 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
“In the resource-based view, on the other hand, collaborations can be used to exploit resource complementarities (Barney, 1991; Das and Teng, 2000; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Hitt et al., 2000; Lavie, 2006; Mowery et al., 1996).”
Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change
Feldman, M. (2004) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0073 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
“Indeed some of the resources they rely on are the relationships they create with other organizations (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996) and their internal organizational culture (Barney 2001).”
BackgroundR&D Cooperation, Partner Diversity, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Analysis†
van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12096 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
The architecture of collaboration
Fjeldstad, Ø., Snow, C. C., Miles, R. E., & Lettl, C. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.1968 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Wu, W.-P. (2007) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00741.x · Cited by 458 · see citing works
“To outperform their competitors, firms are increasingly motivated to seek complementary resources and develop new capabilities through collaboration with other firms and even longstanding competitors in the form of both informal and formal networks such as strategic alliances (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996; Das and…”
Resource and Risk Management in the Strategic Alliance Making Process
Das, T., & Teng, B.-S. (1998) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639802400103 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
“Popular theories that have been applied to strategic alliances include transaction cost economics (Williamson, 1985), game theory (Parkhe, 1993), exchange theory (Gulati, 1995), strategic behavior model (Hagedoorn, 1993), dialectical model (Das & Teng, 1996a), and resource-based view of the firm ( Eisenhardt & Schoonh…”
BackgroundInstitutional polycentrism, entrepreneurs' social networks, and new venture growth
Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arrégle, J., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0095 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
“We know from extant research that entrepreneurs often cultivate and use social networks to access resources (e.g., capital, knowledge, supplies) that facilitate new venture growth (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996; Granovetter, 1995; Kim & Aldrich, 2005; Stam & Elfring, 2008; Stuart & Sorenson, 2007).”
BackgroundAlliance Management Capability: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement
Schilke, O., & Goerzen, A. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310362102 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
“…alliance management capability as a specific dynamic capability designed to modify the organization’s resource base, because R&D alliances (i.e., as opposed to production or marketing alliances) are more clearly directed toward accessing and obtaining new resources (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundMethodFaems, D., de Visser, M., Andries, P., & Looy, B. V. (2010) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00752.x · Cited by 443 · see citing works
“technological capabilities, which in-turn improves a firm’s innovation capabilities ( Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996 ).”
BackgroundAre Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building
Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
“The MNC as a Knowledge Network The idea that foreign direct investment is driven by a firm’s knowledge assets can be traced back to the pioneering work of Hymer (1959) and the subsequent developments by Caves (1971), Buckley and Casson (1976), Teece (1986), and others.”
BackgroundExplaining the international intensity and global diversity of early-stage technology-based firms
Preece, S. B., Miles, G., & Baetz, M. C. (1999) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/s0883-9026(97)00105-5 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
It's the Connections: The Network Perspective in Interorganizational Research
Zaheer, A., Gözübüyük, R., & Milanov, H. (2010) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.24.1.62 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
“Similarly, while we know that both midlevel (Rosenkopf, Metiu, & George, 2001) and top management team social capital (Eisenhardt & Schoonhoven, 1996), as well as board interlocks (Gulati & Westphal, 1999), can translate directly into interorganizational alliances, much network research still…”
BackgroundAlliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association
Lin, Z., Yang, H.-B., & Arya, B. (2009) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.773 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
“Similarly, emerging market firms sought partners that helped them secure access to resources that they lacked, namely financial and technical resources, and strategic positions in the marketplace.”
BackgroundInfluentialGetting Off to a Good Start: The Effects of Upper Echelon Affiliations on Underwriter Prestige
Higgins, M., & Gulati, R. (2003) · Organ. Sci. · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.2.244.15160 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners
Du, J.-S., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.008 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
In search of complementary assets: The determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups
Colombo, M., Grilli, L., & Piva, E. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.002 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
“NTBFs with larger founding teams composed of more educated and more experienced individuals can benefit from the network of business relations of their founders (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHallen, B. L. (2008) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.53.4.685 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
“An organization’s ability to form network ties, and thus alter its network position, is restricted by its attractiveness to potential partners (Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven, 1996).”
BackgroundStartup size and the mechanisms of external learning: increasing opportunity and decreasing ability?
Almeida, P., Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00101-4 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
“Since Hamel, Doz and Prahalad (1989) first suggested that alliances should be viewed as learning opportunities, several studies have supported this idea (e.g., Gulati 1995; Eisenhardt and Schoonhoven 1996).”
BackgroundRotating Leadership and Collaborative Innovation
Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839211428131 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Dartmouth College (US)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-150
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2025001207
- Cited by
- 2,672
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 142 · 2015: 134 · 2014: 159 · 2013: 172 · 2012: 162
- FWCI
- 82.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- resource-based view, entrepreneurial firms, top management teams, social capital, strategic vulnerability, emerging industries, competitive industries, semiconductor industry, transaction cost economics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review