The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms
Abstract
Merger and acquisition activity is a critical means by which technology firms obtain the resources needed to compete in global markets. Effective implementation is essential to making these acquisitions successful, yet prior research on the implementation process has yielded paradoxical findings. I argue that a closer examination of the role of the acquired managers helps to resolve the implementation dilemmas found in prior research, which has focused on the role of the acquiring firm. I use grounded theory‐building techniques to examine the integration of eight technology acquisitions, and find that acquired managers play a key role in achieving two types of value: expected and serendipitous. In promoting the realization of these two types of value, acquired leaders maintain the advantages of both integration and autonomy. Moreover, these leaders enable their organizations to simultaneously experience two often‐conflicting forms of change: exploration and exploitation. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
Leonard-Barton, D. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.248 · Cited by 1,360
Cited by
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Self-citationTemplates and Turns in Qualitative Studies of Strategy and Management
Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011) · Research Methodology in Strategy and Management · doi:10.1108/s1479-8387(2011)0000006007 · Cited by 579
Graebner, M. E., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4131440 · Cited by 566
Self-citationCapron, L., & Shen, J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.612 · Cited by 549
The Process of Postmerger Integration: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Graebner, M. E., Heimeriks, K. H., Huy, Q. N., & Vaara, E. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0078 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Graebner, M. E.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-20
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 751-777
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2007598390
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 34.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.419
- The paper
- Graebner, M. E. (2004). Momentum and serendipity: how acquired leaders create value in the integration of technology firms. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.419
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.