Cited by 1,360Business and Management StudiesQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchManagement and Organizational Studies

A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites

Leonard-Barton, Dorothy·1990·Organization Science

Abstract

This paper describes a case study methodology that combines a real-time longitudinal (three-year) study with nine retrospective case studies about the same phenomenon. These two kinds of case studies offer opportunities for complementary and synergistic data gathering and analysis. That is, specific strengths in each method compensate for some particular weakness in the other. For instance, the retrospective studies offer the opportunity to identify patterns indicative of dynamic processes and the longitudinal study provides a close-up view of those patterns as they evolve over time. The combination of the two types of case studies also enhances three kinds of validity: construct, internal and external. The author also discusses problems with and shortcomings of this dual methodology and suggests the circumstances for which the methodology is especially appropriate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/orsc.1.3.248

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leonard-Barton, D.
Affiliations
Harvard Graduate School of Business, Soldiers Field Road, Boston, Massachusetts 02163
Venue
Organization Science
Published
1990-08
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
248-266
ISSN
  • 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5455
OpenAlex
W2139067007
Cited by
1,360
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 83 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 84 · 2012: 73
FWCI
16.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organization Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
case study method, retrospective case study, mixed methods, construct validity, internal validity, generalizability, dynamic processes, research design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review