The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum
Open accessAbstract
Two very different models of product innovation are postulated and tested. The conservative model assumes that innovation is performed reluctantly, mainly in response to serious challenges. It therefore predicts that innovation will correlate positively with environmental, information processing, structural and decision making variables that represent, or help to recognize and cope with these challenges. In contrast, the entrepreneurial model supposes that innovation is always aggressively pursued and will be very high unless decision makers are warned to slow down. Thus negative correlations are predicted between innovation and the variables that can provide such warning. Correlational and curvilinear regression analyses revealed that each model was supported by conservative and entrepreneurial sub‐samples, respectively, in a diverse sample of 52 Canadian firms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although we do not claim to have a random sample, 'the broad representation of types and sizes of businesses, ..., [suggests that] these ... findings should have a high degree of generality' (Miller and Friesen, 1982, p.7).”
From Entrepreneurial orientation and the franchise system (2013) · cites this paper as Miller and Friesen, 1982
Citations
Cites
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Day, R. H., Cyert, R. M., March, J. G., Clarkson, Cohen, Feigenbaum, D., Greenberg, Moore, Soelberg, Starbuck, et al. (1964) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913056 · Cited by 8,023
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257544 · Cited by 7,487
A Behavioral Theory of the FirmPreprint
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 6,490
Designing Complex Organizations
Galbraith, J. R. (1973) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,424
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967) · Cited by 5,206
Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice
Child, J. (1972) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803857200600101 · Cited by 4,790
The Concept of Corporate Strategy
Iverson, T., & Andrews, K. R. (1987) · Public Productivity Review · doi:10.2307/3380432 · Cited by 4,091
Strategy-Making in Three Modes
Mintzberg, H. (1973) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41164491 · Cited by 1,660
Measuring and Assessing Organizations.
Price, J. L., de Ven, A. H. V., & Ferry, D. L. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392488 · Cited by 1,642
Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process
Tushman, M. L. (1977) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392402 · Cited by 1,496
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Ansoff H. Igor, 1965, Corporate Strategy
- Burns Tom, 1961, The Management of Innovation
- Collins Orvis, 1970, The Organization Makers
- Downs Anthony, 1966, Inside Bureaucracy
- Rogers Everett M., 1971, Communication of Innovations: A Cultural Approach
- Zaltman Gerald, 1973, Innovations and Organizations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568 · Cited by 10,159
Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators
Damanpour, F. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256406 · Cited by 6,542
Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107 · Cited by 5,981
A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225879101600102 · Cited by 3,920
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x · Cited by 3,550
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H.
- Affiliations
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Miller, Danny
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1968725802
- Cited by
- 2,758
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 106 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 114 · 2018: 133 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 138 · 2014: 134 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 30.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
- Keywords
- product innovation, entrepreneurial firms, innovation models, environmental uncertainty, information processing, organizational structure, decision-making, curvilinear relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
