The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process
Abstract
This paper develops a model of the internal corporate venturing process. The model explores conditions under which entrepreneurs are likely to continue with a course of action despite experiencing negative outcomes. Persisting with a course of action despite associated negative outcomes runs counter to trial-and-error learning behavior. We suggest that entrepreneurs are likely to continue with a course of action despite experiencing negative outcomes when the level of ambiguity is high and slack resources are available. In contrast, trial-and-error learning is likely to occur when either the level of ambiguity is low or when slack resources are not available. We examine these and other aspects of the venturing process with longitudinal data on the development of one venture. The data were collected over a 12-year period during the commercial development of cochlear implants within a large diversified corporation. The results support our core hypotheses on trial-and-error learning and action persistence while extending our understanding of associated processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action
Staw, B. M. (1976) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2 · Cited by 2,061
The Escalation of Commitment To a Course of Action
Staw, B. M. (1981) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1981.4285694 · Cited by 1,693
Cited by
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Prolegomena on Coevolution: A Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms
Lewin, A. Y., & Volberda, H. W. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.5.519 · Cited by 1,049
Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130803 · Cited by 939
Learning while (re)configuring: Business model innovation processes in established firms
Berends, H., Smits, A., Reymen, I., & Podoynitsyna, K. (2016) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/1476127016632758 · Cited by 274
Garud, R. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00783.x · Cited by 236
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Garud, R., & van de ven, A. H.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 93-109
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2051274604
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.4250131008
- The paper
- Garud, R., & van de ven, A. H. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.