The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic groups: A cognitive perspective
Abstract
The strategic group concept provides an attractive middle ground between firm and industry for both theory development and empirical analysis. To date, this concept has been defined by researchers in terms of secondary accounting and financial data, and a number of critics have questioned the validity of this work. Our research shows that industry participants share perceptions about strategic commonalities among firms, and that participants cluster competitors in subtle ways not reflected in extant academic research on strategic groups. Decision makers' perceptions and cognitions are phenomena that can be expected to influence industry evolution. They are of research interest as an additional source of data on firm commonalities which helps address concerns about previous strategic group research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“provides multimethod confirmation (Huff, 1982; Jick, 1979) for extant research using archival”
Cited by
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
CONFIGURATIONAL APPROACHES TO ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS.
MEYER, A. D., TSUI, A. S., & HININGS, C. R. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256809 · Cited by 2,053
Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639402000206 · Cited by 1,632
INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION THROUGH START-UP OR ACQUISITION: A LEARNING PERSPECTIVE.
Barkema, H. G., & Vermeulen, F. (1998) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256894 · Cited by 1,579
Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500307 · Cited by 1,364
Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002 · Cited by 661
Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences
Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190217 · Cited by 444
Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428107302907 · Cited by 399
Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314553276 · Cited by 352
A Selective Review of Time Assumptions in Strategy Research
Mosakowski, E., & Earley, P. C. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259207 · Cited by 279
The Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension
Pillai, K. G., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kalyanaram, G., & Nair, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12085 · Cited by 185
Schneider, S., & Leyer, M. (2019) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.2982 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Reger, R. K., & Huff, A. S.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-123
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2142538331
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 91.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
