Cited by 399Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchBusiness and Management StudiesStrategic Planning and Analysis

Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Strategic Management Research: An Examination of Combinations of Industry, Corporate, and Business-Unit Effects

Greckhamer, Thomas, Misangyi, Vilmos F., Elms, Heather, Lacey, Rodney·2008·Organizational Research Methods

Abstract

The authors present qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as a viable method for strategic management research. Specifically, they demonstrate its ability to examine the potential interdependence and complexity among effects through a study of how industry, corporate, and business-unit attributes combine in determining business-unit performance. They present in an accessible manner the consecutive phases of the QCA approach by analyzing a sample of 2,841 cases of business-unit performance, and they examine the insights that the QCA analysis provides for this particular stream of literature. The authors conclude with a discussion of the benefits and limitations QCA poses for strategic management research more generally, including major contingencies under which QCA or linear methods may be more appropriate for strategy research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094428107302907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greckhamer et al.'s study of how industry, corporate, and business-unit attributes combine to produce both superior and inferior performance illustrated QCA's potential to examine all three aspects of causal complexity and to explore the inherent limited diversity of organizational phenomena.

    “Their study of how industry, corporate, and businessunit attributes combine to produce both superior and inferior performance illustrated QCA's potential to examine all three aspects of causal complexity (conjunction, equifinality, and asymmetry) and to explore the inherent limited diversity of organizational phenomena.”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Greckhamer et al., 2008

  • One of the seven recipes of industry, corporate, and business-unit attributes found by Greckhamer et al. (2008) to produce high business-unit performance in the manufacturing sector involved large business-units in munificent industries.

    “For example, one of the seven recipes of industry, corporate, and business-unit attributes found by Greckhamer et al. (2008) to produce high business-unit performance in the manufacturing sector involved large business-units in munificent industries.”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Greckhamer et al., 2008

  • Greckhamer et al. (2008) aimed to advance the use of QCA in strategic management research.

    “Greckhamer et al. (2008) aimed to advance the use of QCA in strategic management research.”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Greckhamer et al., 2008

  • Another recipe among the seven configurations found by Greckhamer et al. (2008) was that high performance in the manufacturing sector resulted when business units were part of highly diversified corporations and operated in munificent industries.

    “For example, another recipe among the seven configurations found by Greckhamer et al. (2008) was that high performance in the manufacturing sector resulted when business units were part of highly diversified corporations and operated in munificent industries-i.e., business-unit success came through either large size and high industry munificence or”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Greckhamer et al., 2008

  • A third recipe among Greckhamer et al.'s (2008) findings for high performance in manufacturing involved business units that were not large and part of highly diversified corporations and that competed in industries that were not highly competitive and not highly dynamic.

    “Continuing the previous example, a third recipe among Greckhamer et al.'s (2008) findings for high performance in manufacturing involved business units that were not large and part of highly diversified corporations and that competed in industries that were not highly competitive and not highly dynamic.”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Greckhamer et al., 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., Elms, H., & Lacey, R.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • American University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Greckhamer, Thomas
Venue
Organizational Research Methods
Published
2007-11-28
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
695-726
ISSN
  • 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7425
OpenAlex
W1987139177
Cited by
399
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organizational Research Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Strategic Planning and Analysis
Keywords
qualitative comparative analysis, strategic management research, business unit performance, firm characteristics, contingency theory, nonlinear effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review