CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 662Innovation Diffusion and ForecastingInnovation and Knowledge ManagementEconomic Theory and Institutions

Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change

Open access
Kaplan, Sarah, Tripsas, Mary·2008·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002

Cites

148 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users with experience in a technology (lead users) are able to shape subsequent technology development for further CE-I4.0 integration.

    “Users with experience in a technology-the lead users-are also able to shape subsequent technology development (than those originally intended) for further CE-I4.0 integration [140].”

    From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

  • Users of CE-I4.0 tools are expected to develop different interpretations of new technologies as they use them in practice, which can drive additional variation and functions in the original design stage.

    “Users of CE-I4.0 tools are expected to develop different interpretations of new technologies as they use them in practice, which can drive additional variation [140] and functions in the original design stage, for example, design for remanufactured DfRem.”

    From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

  • When existing I4.0 to CE approach technology reaches a point of diminishing returns, a new technology will emerge.

    “When existing I4.0 to CE approach technology reaches a point of diminishing returns, a new technology will emerge [140], e.g., from Bar code to RFID.”

    From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

  • Key reasons emphasizing the need for known technological infrastructure to support CE-DT integration include turbulent and competitive markets, increasingly complex IT environments, data complexity, and interconnected data networks.

    “Key reasons exist which emphasize the need for known technological infrastructure to support CE-DT integration. These include the turbulent and competitive markets [142] which industries and CE stakeholders operate from [140], the increasingly complex IT environment which organizations deal with, data complexity, and interconnected data networks [145].”

    From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [140]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kaplan, Sarah
ORCID
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
790-805
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
OpenAlex
W3124736729
Cited by
661
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard Business School
  • Dartmouth College
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
Keywords
technological trajectories, technology life cycle, technological frames, co-evolutionary model, dominant design, incremental change, discontinuities, technological change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review