The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s
Abstract
It is difficult to get a clear picture of the relative influence of management journals because previous studies have focused on a single sub‐area in the field over a relatively restricted number of years, and/or have used inconsistent criteria to judge journal influence. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine journal influence using citations from 28 journals over the past two decades. The findings show that the top seven journals accounted for 61 percent of all of the citations in the journals included, and that the three journals that showed the greatest increase in influence over the past 20 years were AMJ, AMR , and SMJ . Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For this research, Scopus is utilized.”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,725
Competitive advantage, creating and sustaining superior performance
Weil, K. E. (1985) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 10,284
Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance
Ponter, M. E. (1998) · Cited by 5,821
FOREIGN ENTRY, CULTURAL BARRIERS, AND LEARNING
Barkema, H. G., Bell, J., & Pennings, J. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199602)17:2 · Cited by 1,819
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B
Kerr, S. (1975) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255378 · Cited by 1,585
Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets
Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:1 · Cited by 1,509
Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable
Pfeffer, J. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9402210152 · Cited by 1,404
DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY PAY: AN AGENCY THEORY PERSPECTIVE.
Gómez‐Mejía, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256535 · Cited by 702
The Slowdown of the Economics Publishing Process
Ellison, G. (2000) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/341868 · Cited by 503
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cabell DWE, 2000, Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Management
- Coe R, 1969, Evaluating journal publication: perceptions versus reality, AACSB Bulletin, 6, 23
- Niemi AW, 1988, Research productivity of American business schools, 1975–85, Review of Business and Economic Research, 23, 1
- 10.2307/258592 · DOI
- 10.2307/2577563 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 906
Retail store formats, competition and shopper behavior: A Systematic review
Bonfrer, A., Chintagunta, P. K., & Dhar, S. (2022) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2022.02.006 · Cited by 83
Business model innovation for urban smartization
Schiavone, F., Paolone, F., & Mancini, D. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.028 · Cited by 83
Chatterjee, D., & Sahasranamam, S. (2017) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2017.46 · Cited by 82
Progress toward understanding tensions in corporate venture capital: A systematic review
Jeon, E., & Maula, M. V. J. (2022) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106226 · Cited by 67
“To conduct our systematic review of the CVC research covering the period from 1981 to 2019, we sought to identify relevant CVC articles in leading peer-reviewed journals because they are considered to be validated knowledge that has a large impact on scholarship (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundBergmann, H., Mueller, S., & Schrettle, T. (2014) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing · doi:10.1504/ijev.2014.064691 · Cited by 77
“We only included articles from peer-reviewed journals, as they can be considered to convey the most scientifically validated knowledge with the highest impact in the field (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundManagement Journals as Venues for Publication of Family Business Research
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Kellermanns, F. W., Matherne, C. F., & Debicki, B. J. (2008) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00263.x · Cited by 81
Conlon, D. E., Morgeson, F. P., McNamara, G. M., Wiseman, R. M., & Skilton, P. F. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22798160 · Cited by 79
“For example, Podsakoff et al. (2005) noted that over the period 1981–99, 6 of the top 7 journals in their study of 28 journals remained in the top quartile, with only MS dropping out (and being replaced by PPsych).”
BackgroundInfluentialExperimental methods in entrepreneurship research: the status quo
Kraus, S., Meier, F., & Niemand, T. (2016) · International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research · doi:10.1108/ijebr-05-2016-0135 · Cited by 79
Αποστολόπουλος, Ν., Ratten, V., Petropoulos, D. P., Liargovas, P. G., & Anastasopoulou, E. E. (2021) · Strategic Change · doi:10.1002/jsc.2400 · Cited by 79
“The articles investigated here are extracted only from peer-reviewed journals on the assumption that the application of this criterion excludes sanctioned studies (Jones, Coviello, & Tang, 2011; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Bachrach, & Podsakoff, 2005).”
BackgroundJasinenko, A., & Steuber, J. (2022) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12852 · Cited by 109
Ferreira, M. P., Pinto, C. F., & Serra, F. A. R. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1172-8 · Cited by 79
Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2020) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-07-2019-0202 · Cited by 81
Service quality in the sharing economy: A review and research agenda
Akhmedova, A., Manresa, A., Rivera, D. E., & Bikfalvi, A. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12680 · Cited by 81
Reconnecting With the Spirit of Workplace Ethnography
Zickar, M. J., & Carter, N. T. (2010) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428109338070 · Cited by 78
Offshoring of Services: A Review of the Literature and Organizing Framework
Pisani, N., & Ricart, J. E. (2015) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-015-0270-7 · Cited by 77
“…of outlets, we based our choice on a highly established list of management journals (Gomez-Mejia and Balkin 1992; Judge et al. 2007; Pisani 2009; Podsakoff et al. 2005; Schmeisser 2013; Werner 2002) and selected: Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management…”
MethodResearch on corporate divestitures: A synthesis
Moschieri, C., & Mair, J. (2008) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/s1833367200003163 · Cited by 77
The roles of the HR function: A systematic review of tensions, continuity and change
Cayrat, C., & Boxall, P. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100984 · Cited by 107
25 Years of Technovation: Characterisation and evolution of the journal
Merino, T. G., do Carmo, M. L. P., & Álvarez, M. V. S. (2006) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.11.005 · Cited by 76
Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1937-y · Cited by 76
Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement
Akenroye, T. O., Owens, J. D., Baz, J. E., & Durowoju, O. A. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0447 · Cited by 81
Professional Competence of Vocational Teachers: a Conceptual Review
Antera, S. (2021) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-021-09271-7 · Cited by 142
Exploring how new industrial paradigms affect the workforce: A literature review of Operator 4.0.
Ciccarelli, M., Papetti, A., & Germani, M. (2023) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.08.016 · Cited by 75
Work analysis: From technique to theory.
Morgeson, F. P., & Dierdorff, E. C. (2010) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12170-001 · Cited by 75
A Review of Empirical Research on Dynamic Competitive Strategy
Hutzschenreuter, T., & Israel, S. (2009) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00246.x · Cited by 65
Mucowska, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13115894 · Cited by 73
“Conference papers and research articles published in English in academic journals were selected for the literature review [48].”
BackgroundWho is doing “transnational diaspora entrepreneurship”? Understanding formal identity and status
Elo, M., Taübe, F., & Servais, P. (2021) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101240 · Cited by 73
International Management Research: Investigating its Recent Diffusion in Top Management Journals
Pisani, N. (2008) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206308321552 · Cited by 73
“This measure, also called impact factor, is frequently used as a proxy to determine the relative influence of journals in their corresponding fields (DuBois & Reeb, 2000; Judge et al., 2007; Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA review of manufacturing flexibility: systematising the concept
Pérez-Pérez, M., Bedia, A. M. S., & Fernández, M. C. L. (2016) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1138151 · Cited by 73
“With regard to the type of document, the decision was made to select the articles published in journals as the basis for analysis since they are the source of the most up-to-date knowledge and have a considerably greater impact on the field (Podsakoff et al. 2005).”
BackgroundHow to reconsider risk management in SMEs? An Advanced, Reasoned and Organised Literature Review
Crovini, C., Ossola, G., & Britzelmaier, B. (2020) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2020.11.002 · Cited by 89
In search of the frugal innovation strategy
Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., & Oliveira, M. D. M. (2020) · Review of International Business and Strategy · doi:10.1108/ribs-10-2019-0142 · Cited by 70
Gimenez-Jimenez, D., & Calabrò, A. (2017) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-017-0480-5 · Cited by 70
Hoepner, A. G. F., & McMillan, D. G. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1454793 · Cited by 74
Geotourism and Territorial Development: a Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda
Duarte, A., Braga, V. L. D. S., Marques, C. S., & Sá, A. A. (2020) · Geoheritage · doi:10.1007/s12371-020-00478-z · Cited by 69
Past, present and future of AI in marketing and knowledge management
Marvi, R., Foroudi, P., & Cuomo, M. T. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0634 · Cited by 89
Entrepreneurial Fraud: A Multidisciplinary Review and Synthesized Framework
Scheaf, D. J., & Wood, M. S. (2021) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587211001818 · Cited by 71
“, 2011), we limited the article retrieval process to peer- reviewed journal articles because they represent scientifically substantiated knowledge and have the highest impact on the field (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
MethodGender Diversity in Editorial Boards of Management Journals
Metz, I., & Harzing, A.-W. K. (2009) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2009.47785472 · Cited by 84
“Although what constitutes the “best” editorial board is subjective and debatable, there is some agreement that it encompasses a combination of high academic standing, and timely and constructive reviews to authors (e.g., Miller, 2006; Podsakoff et al., 2005; Rynes, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe roles of SMEs in implementing CSR in supply chains: a systematic literature review
Stekelorum, R. (2019) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2019.1679101 · Cited by 67
How Do Consumers See Firms’ Family Nature? A Review of the Literature
Andreini, D., Bettinelli, C., Pedeliento, G., & Apa, R. (2019) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486519890229 · Cited by 68
Most cited articles and authors in global strategy research
Peng, M. W., & Zhou, J. Q. (2006) · Journal of International Management · doi:10.1016/j.intman.2006.04.001 · Cited by 68
“, 2006; Kumar and Kundu, 2004; Phene and Guisinger, 1998) and strategic management (Boyd et al., 2005; MacMillan, 1991; Park and Gordon, 1996; Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialZilber, T. B., Amis, J., & Mair, J. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x201959 · Cited by 66
Are they willing to work for you? An employee-centric view to employer brand attractiveness
Ronda, L., Valor, C., & Abril, C. (2018) · Journal of Product & Brand Management · doi:10.1108/jpbm-07-2017-1522 · Cited by 69
Schätzlein, L., Schlütter, D., & Hahn, R. (2022) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12310 · Cited by 71
Kirca, A. H., & Yaprak, A. (2010) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.01.001 · Cited by 65
Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives
De Giacomo, M. R., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2576 · Cited by 71
Lean Six Sigma in financial services industry: a systematic review and agenda for future research
Vashishth, A., Chakraborty, A., & Antony, J. (2017) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2017.1308820 · Cited by 64
“To standardise and streamline the process (1) Rao and Bargerstock (2013) (2) De Koning (2008a) (3) Furterer and Elshennawy (2005) (4) Lokkerbol et al.”
MethodEntrepreneurship in Times of Crisis: A Comprehensive Review with Future Directions
Lee, Y., Kim, J., Mah, S., & KARR, A. (2023) · Entrepreneurship Research Journal · doi:10.1515/erj-2022-0366 · Cited by 63
Villas, M. V., de Macedo-Soares, T. D. L. V. A., & Russo, G. M. (2008) · BAR - Brazilian Administration Review · doi:10.1590/s1807-76922008000200005 · Cited by 63
“For Rainer and Miller (2005), although many authors (Baden-Fuller et al., 2000; Campos, 2003; Geary et al., 2004; Holsapple et al., 1994; Podsakoff et al., 2005; Vanti, 2002) have conducted studies ranking the quality of scientific journals over the past 15 years, with a view to helping researchers to identify the sta…”
BackgroundOne member, two leaders: Extending leader–member exchange theory to a dual leadership context.
Vidyarthi, P. R., Erdoğan, B., Anand, S., Liden, R. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0035466 · Cited by 84
Knowledge structure in product- and brand origin–related research
Samiee, S., & Chabowski, B. R. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00767-7 · Cited by 61
Polzer, T., Adhikari, P., Phuong, N. C., & Gårseth‐Nesbakk, L. (2021) · Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management · doi:10.1108/jpbafm-01-2021-0016 · Cited by 73
Identifying Factors Associated with Consumers’ Adoption of e-Mobility—A Systematic Literature Review
Stockkamp, C., Schäfer, J., Millemann, J. A., & Heidenreich, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910975 · Cited by 60
Psillaki, M., Αποστολόπουλος, Ν., Makris, I., Liargovas, P. G., Apostolopoulos, S., Dimitrakopoulos, P., & Sklias, G. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16020755 · Cited by 60
Schlütter, D., Schätzlein, L., Hahn, R., & Waldner, C. J. (2023) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12978 · Cited by 60
Are youth really different? New beliefs for old practices in entrepreneurship
Minola, T., Criaco, G., & Cassia, L. (2014) · International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management · doi:10.1504/ijeim.2014.062881 · Cited by 59
Tipu, S. A. A. (2021) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00494-5 · Cited by 61
Magistretti, S., & Trabucchi, D. (2024) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-024-00745-1 · Cited by 72
Methodological issues in dynamic capabilities research – a critical review
Eriksson, T. (2013) · Baltic Journal of Management · doi:10.1108/bjom-jul-2011-0072 · Cited by 58
Ronda‐Pupo, G. A., & Martín, L. Á. G. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0287-4 · Cited by 59
“Podsakoff et al. (2005) address the most influential journals within the management field.”
BackgroundInfluentialCucari, N. (2019) · Corporate Governance · doi:10.1108/cg-04-2018-0161 · Cited by 58
Framework for measuring research and innovation impact
Cheah, S. L. (2016) · Innovation · doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1219230 · Cited by 58
Thai, Q. H., Khương, M. N., & Do, T. T. (2023) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231153060 · Cited by 67
“The authors also used the following criteria: (1) the paper must be a study which is written in English, (2) the paper must be a peer-review publication, (3) the paper must be a journal article because they are examined to deliver the most influences and are more reliable than other resources (Podsakoff et al., 2005),…”
BackgroundMethodBartoloni, S., & Ancillai, C. (2023) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12360 · Cited by 87
The qualitative case research in international entrepreneurship: a state of the art and analysis
Ji, J., Plakoyiannaki, E., Dimitratos, P., & Chen, S. (2018) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/imr-02-2017-0052 · Cited by 57
Clarifying the disruptive innovation puzzle: a critical review
Martínez-Vergara, S. J., & Valls‐Pasola, J. (2020) · European Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1108/ejim-07-2019-0198 · Cited by 57
Antons, D., Joshi, A. M., & Salge, T. O. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318774619 · Cited by 63
Klarin, A. (2019) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101067 · Cited by 59
Searching for the right application: A technology development review and research agenda
Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., & Verganti, R. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119879 · Cited by 60
Nguyen, Q. T. K., & Kim, S. (2020) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101670 · Cited by 60
A Review of Energy Management Assessment Models for Industrial Energy Efficiency
Hasan, A. S. M. M., & Trianni, A. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13215713 · Cited by 56
“Working papers are not considered due to their review process state and reliability issue [36].”
BackgroundAardvark et al.: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies
Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. (2007) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551507077419 · Cited by 55
“The Journal of Management currently has a rejection rate of 92% [32] and the Harvard Business Review approaching 99% [20], which riposte to those who would question standards in management studies could hardly be more robust.”
BackgroundSmart city technologies from the perspective of technology acceptance
Dirsehan, T., & van Zoonen, L. (2022) · IET Smart Cities · doi:10.1049/smc2.12040 · Cited by 55
Integration of Lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0: a bibliometric analysis
Kumar, N. R., Singh, A., Gupta, S., Kaswan, M. S., & Singh, M. (2023) · The TQM Journal · doi:10.1108/tqm-07-2022-0243 · Cited by 61
Erdiaw‐Kwasie, M. O., Abunyewah, M., & Baah, C. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140645 · Cited by 55
Women’s entrepreneurship and internationalization: patterns and trends
Ratten, V., & Tajeddini, K. (2018) · International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy · doi:10.1108/ijssp-01-2018-0001 · Cited by 54
Structural aspects of corporate governance and family firm performance: a systematic review
Azila-Gbettor, E. M., Honyenuga, B. Q., Berent‐Braun, M. M., & Kil, A. J. (2018) · Journal of Family Business Management · doi:10.1108/jfbm-12-2017-0045 · Cited by 54
Ethical food and the kosher certification: a literature review
Corte, V. D., Gaudio, G. D., & Sepe, F. (2018) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-09-2017-0538 · Cited by 53
Stead, S., Wetzels, R. W. H., Wetzels, M. G. M., Odekerken‐Schröder, G., & Mahr, D. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221079941 · Cited by 53
“Fourth, methodologically, we combine co-citation and text mining methods from bibliometric research (Randhawa, Wilden, and Hohberger 2016) to overcome some biases of traditional literature reviews (Podsakoff et al. 2005).”
MethodBoard monitoring of the chief financial officer: A review and research agenda
Uhde, D. A., Klarner, P., & Tuschke, A. C. (2016) · Corporate Governance An International Review · doi:10.1111/corg.12188 · Cited by 53
Water resources in the hotel industry: a systematic literature review
Antonova, N. L., Ruiz-Rosa, I., & Jiménez, J. M. (2021) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-07-2020-0711 · Cited by 52
Managing Family Members: How Monitoring and Collaboration Affect Extra-Role Behavior in Family Firms
Eddleston, K., Kellermanns, F., & Kidwell, R. E. (2018) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21825 · Cited by 50
Treviño, L. J., Mixon, F. G., Funk, C., & Inkpen, A. C. (2010) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.02.004 · Cited by 51
An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: a longitudinal study of management journals
Metz, I., & Harzing, A.-W. K. (2012) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483481211212940 · Cited by 51
“Moreover, journal rankings are generally relatively stable over time (see e.g. Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Bachrach and Podsakoff, 2005).”
BackgroundInterconnected business models: present debates and future agenda
Jocevski, M., Arvidsson, N., & Ghezzi, A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-06-2019-0292 · Cited by 49
What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson (1991)? A citation context study
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2010) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/1350507609341091 · Cited by 52
“…these databases do not contain every journal (particularly recently established journals), they are fairly comprehensive, covering over 8000 journals, and are frequently used in citation studies (e.g. Anderson, 2006; Engwall, 1998; Podsakoff et al., 2005; Ramos-Rodriguez and RuizNavarro, 2004).”
BackgroundThe Circulation of Ideas across Academic Communities: When locals re-import exported ideas
Battilana, J., Anteby, M., & Sengul, M. (2010) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840610372573 · Cited by 49
Improving the performance/competency of small and medium enterprises through intellectual capital
Bansal, S., Garg, I., Jain, M., & Yadav, A. (2022) · Journal of Intellectual Capital · doi:10.1108/jic-07-2021-0189 · Cited by 49
Bhoir, M., & Sinha, V. (2024) · Future Business Journal · doi:10.1186/s43093-024-00382-w · Cited by 153
“Second, we limited our studies to journals with 1 + impact factor (IF) as they present well-grounded information and thus presents supremacy [64].”
BackgroundJournal ranking analyses of operations management research
Petersen, C. G., Aase, G. R., & Heiser, D. R. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111119533 · Cited by 49
“, 2003; Barnes, 2005), management (Podsakoff et al., 2005), international business (DuBois and Reeb, 2000), and marketing (Koojaroenprasit et al.”
BackgroundMethodBranding in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)
Odoom, R., Narteh, B., & Boateng, R. (2017) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-12-2015-0091 · Cited by 48
Exploring the knowledge structure of entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention
Sánchez, J. J. N., Pérez‐Pérez, C., & González‐Torres, T. (2022) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-022-00814-5 · Cited by 69
“To consider exclusively contrasted knowledge, we searched for articles only (Podsakoff et al., 2005).”
BackgroundTorugsa, N. A., & O’Donohue, W. (2015) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.026 · Cited by 47
The Intention to Purchase Recycled Products: Towards an Integrative Theoretical Framework
Bigliardi, B., Campisi, D., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., Galati, F., & Petroni, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12229739 · Cited by 59
Yang, M., & Gabrielsson, P. (2018) · Journal of International Marketing · doi:10.1177/1069031x18809988 · Cited by 51
“The search included only peer-reviewed journal articles that are either conceptual or empirical papers because journal articles contain validated knowledge (Podsakoff et al. 2005).”
BackgroundInnovation in international business research: a call for multiple paradigms
Sullivan, D. P., & Daniels, J. D. (2008) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400400 · Cited by 47
Global Contests in the Production of Business Knowledge
Mangematin, V., & Baden‐Fuller, C. W. F. (2008) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2007.11.005 · Cited by 47
Zhao, G., Olan, F., Liu, S., Hormazábal, J. H., López, C., Zubairu, N., Zhang, J., & Chen, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2022.3221361 · Cited by 46
Social Media Influencer Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review Using TCM and ADO Framework
Pushparaj, P., & Kushwaha, B. P. (2024) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.13098 · Cited by 46
Strategies for managing impressions of racial identity in the workplace.
Roberts, L., Cha, S., & Kim, S. S. (2014) · Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037238 · Cited by 49
Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review
Hamann, P. M. (2017) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-017-0132-4 · Cited by 46
“Fourth, I concentrate on journal articles because they are considered as validated knowledge and are likely to have the highest impact on researchers and practitioners (Podsakoff et al. 2005).”
BackgroundA Citation‐Based Ranking of Strategic Management Journals
Azar, O. H., & Brock, D. (2008) · Journal of Economics & Management Strategy · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9134.2008.00195.x · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Corresponding author
- Podsakoff, Philip M.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 473-488
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2141967394
- Cited by
- 912
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- management journals, journal influence, citation analysis, citation impact, top journals, scholarly publishing, 1980s-1990s
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review