The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm‐level performance
Abstract
Abstract To help understand how firms develop and maintain dynamic capabilities, we examine the effects of the dynamics, management, and governance of R & D and marketing resource deployments on firm‐level economic performance. In a sample of technology‐based entrepreneurial firms, we find that a history of increased investments in marketing is an enduring source of competitive advantage. We also find that managers' firm‐specific experience positively moderates the relationship between R & D deployment intensity and economic returns. In addition, institutional ownership boosts economic returns from marketing deployments by subjecting these deployments to increased scrutiny and by sending positive signals to the market about the firm. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Kor and Mahoney's (2005: 495) finding in the medical instruments industry that 'R&D investments convert into revenue-generating products typically within a period of three years'”
From On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism (2014) · cites this paper as Kor and Mahoney, 2005
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Separation of Ownership and Control
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/467037 · Cited by 19,914
The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
Penrose, E. T. (1995) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(96)90295-2 · Cited by 13,942
Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(90)90069-c · Cited by 4,619
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090706 · Cited by 3,657
The resource‐based view within the conversation of strategic management
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250130505 · Cited by 3,474
Self-citationVenture Capitalist Certification in Initial Public Offerings
Megginson, W. L., & Weiss, K. A. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03770.x · Cited by 2,397
BRAV, A., & GOMPERS, P. A. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02742.x · Cited by 1,464
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda
Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00616.x · Cited by 3,152
Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and an Agenda for the Future
Barreto, I. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309350776 · Cited by 1,948
Schilke, O. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2099 · Cited by 1,264
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J., & Ketchen, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022147 · Cited by 1,368
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities: Review and Assessment of Managerial Impact on Strategic Change
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314561301 · Cited by 1,045
Metadata
- Authors
- Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mahoney, Joseph T.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 489-496
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2024812403
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 39.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- dynamic capabilities, resource deployment, competitive advantage, institutional ownership, entrepreneurial firms, technology companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review