The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes that transaction costs and capabilities are fundamentally intertwined in the determination of vertical scope, and identifies the key mechanisms of their co‐evolution. Specifically, we argue that capability differences are a necessary condition for vertical specialization; and that transaction cost reductions only lead to specialization when capabilities along the value chain are heterogeneous. Furthermore, we argue that there are four evolutionary mechanisms that shape vertical scope over time. First, the selection process, itself driven by capability differences, dynamically shapes vertical scope; second, transaction costs are endogenously changed by firms that try to reshape the transactional environment to increase their profit and market share; third, changes in vertical scope affect the nature of the capability development process, i.e., the way in which firms improve their operations over time; and finally, the changes in the capability development process reshape the capability pool in the industry, changing the roster of qualified participants. These dynamics of capability and transaction cost co‐evolution are illustrated through two contrasting examples: the mortgage banking industry in the United States, which shows the shift from integrated to disintegrated production; and the Swiss watch‐manufacturing industry, which went from disintegration to integration. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Coase, R. H. (1937) · Economica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x · Cited by 23,972
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
Self-citationRichardson, G. B. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230256 · Cited by 2,200
Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise
Teece, D. J. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90002-5 · Cited by 1,775
On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation
(1988) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036942 · Cited by 422
Self-citation
Cited by
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Self-citationSchilke, O., Hu, S., & Helfat, C. E. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0014 · Cited by 1,226
How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study
Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012 · Cited by 623
Resource management in dyadic competitive rivalry: The effects of resource bundling and deployment
Sirmon, D. G., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.34789656 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 395-413
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W1991001023
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 76.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smj.460
- The paper
- Jacobides, M. G., & Winter, S. G. (2005). The co‐evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.460
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.