CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 143Economic Theory and InstitutionsOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementCritical Realism in Sociology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Behavioral assumptions and theory development: the case of transaction cost economics

Tsang, Eric W. K.·2006·Strategic Management Journal
DOI 10.1002/smj.553
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

From a critical realist perspective, I discuss the role played by behavioral assumptions in organization theories, and use transaction cost economics as an illustrative example. Core behavioral assumptions often constitute the foundation of the mechanismic explanations of a theory, and thus should play a pivotal role in theory development. I distinguish between assumption‐based and assumption‐omitted theory testing, and show that empirical research in transaction cost economics has been dominated by assumption‐omitted testing. To establish a solid foundation for a new theory, management researchers should pay more attention to assumption‐based testing. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.553

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Ackroyd S, 2000, Realist Perspectives on Management and Organizations.
  2. 10.2307/258630 · DOI
  3. Chow GC, 1983, Econometrics.
  4. 10.2307/258191 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2307/258627 · DOI
  6. 10.2307/258020 · DOI
  7. Johnston J, 1991, Econometric Methods
  8. Lester RA, 1946, Shortcomings of marginal analysis for wage‐employment problems, American Economic Review, 36, 63
  9. Sayer A, 1992, Method in Social Science
  10. 10.2307/259353 · DOI
  11. 10.2307/258628 · DOI
  12. 10.2307/259103 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Tsang, E. W. K.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Tsang, Eric W. K.
ORCID
Tsang, Eric W. K.
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-07-31
Volume
27
Issue
11
Pages
999-1011
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
DOI
10.1002/smj.553
OpenAlex
W2068914737
Cited by
143
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Realism in Sociology
Keywords
transaction cost economics, behavioral assumptions, critical realism, theory development, organizational theory, management research methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review