Internet companies' growth strategies: determinants of investment intensity and long‐term performance
Abstract
To exploit first‐mover advantages, pioneers may be motivated to amass customers before rivals enter the market. Likewise, when they enjoy increasing returns due to network effects, static scale economies, or learning effects, companies have incentives to invest aggressively in growth. This paper presents econometric analysis of factors that determined the intensity of Internet companies' investments in growth, and analyzes the long‐term performance consequences of such investments. Results indicate that first movers spent significantly more on upfront marketing than non‐pioneers. Contrary to expectations, however, firms in markets that exhibited increasing returns did not spend more on their early customer acquisition efforts than other sample companies. Although the typical sample company did not earn positive long‐term returns, heavy early investments in growth were nevertheless economically rational. In most cases, reducing marketing outlays would have worsened a bad outcome, consistent with an inverted ‘U’ relationship between long‐term returns and upfront marketing spending. Thus, the typical sample company invested in marketing, ex ante, at levels close to those that would have maximized returns, observed ex post. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The complementors' entry risk is at its highest early in the industry lifecycle.
“lending support to the notion that the complementors' entry risk is at its highest early in the industry lifecycle”
From Smart Timing for Smart Products? Complementor Multihoming in Nascent Platform Markets (2026) · cites this paper as Eisenmann 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Eisenmann, T. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eisenmann, Thomas R.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-10-30
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1183-1204
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W2047217792
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Keywords
- internet companies, growth strategy, investment intensity, first-mover advantage, pioneering, increasing returns, network effects, economies of scale, learning effects, marketing budget, customer acquisition, long-term performance, inverted U-shaped relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review