The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon‐Nanotube Shape and Individualization Critical for Renal Excretion
Abstract
Nanotube shape and the degree of individualization are found to play a critical role in their in vivo transport and translocation profile. Carbon nanotubes (see image) that are well individualized and soluble in biological milieu can cross the kidney barrier and be excreted in urine.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Surprisingly, large nanofiber-like materials, such as individualized carbon nanotubes with diameters and lengths of up to 20 – 30 nm and 500 – 2000 nm, respectively, easily cross through the renal filtration barrier when aligned in the right orientation, and are cleared with similar efficiency as small molecules [41, 42].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cites
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- 10.1073/pnas.0509009103 · DOI
- 10.1166/jnn.2004.146 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000907 · DOI
- 10.1002/adma.200702334 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2007.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0609265103 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2006.170 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI23577 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.281.4.F579 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajprenal.00171.2004 · DOI
- 10.1038/nnano.2007.70 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/438044a · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1126298 · DOI
- Drumond M. C., 1994, Am. J. Physiol., 266, F1, 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.266.1.C1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Sun, L., Han, D., Li, H., & Wang, C. (2010) · Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2009.11.007 · Cited by 311
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
PEGylated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Nanocarriers for Cyclosporin A Delivery
Hadidi, N., Kobarfard, F., Nafissi-Varcheh, N., & Aboofazeli, R. (2013) · AAPS PharmSciTech · doi:10.1208/s12249-013-9944-2 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacerda, L., Herrero, M. A., Venner, K., Bianco, A., Prato, M., & Kostarelos, K.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-31
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1130-1132
- ISSN
- 1613-6810
- 1613-6829
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
