The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic Surface Engineering of Magnetic Nanoworms for In vivo Tumor Targeting
Open accessAbstract
In the design of nanoparticles that can target disease tissue in vivo, parameters such as targeting ligand density, type of target receptor, and nanoparticle shape can play an important role in determining the extent of accumulation. Herein, a systematic study of these parameters for the targeting of mouse xenograft tumors is performed using superparamagnetic iron oxide as a model nanoparticle system. The type of targeting peptide (recognizing cell surface versus extracellular matrix), the surface coverage of the peptide, its attachment chemistry, and the shape of the nanomaterial [elongated (nanoworm, NW) versus spherical (nanosphere, NS)] are varied. Nanoparticle circulation times and in vivo tumor‐targeting efficiencies are quantified in two xenograft models of human tumors (MDA‐MB‐435 human carcinoma and HT1080 human fibrosarcoma). It is found that the in vivo tumor‐targeting ability of the NW is superior to that of the NS, that the smaller, neutral CREKA targeting group is more effective than the larger, positively charged F3 molecule, that a maximum in tumor‐targeting efficiency and blood half‐life is observed with ≈60 CREKA peptides per NW for either the HT1080 or the MDA‐MB‐435 tumor types, and that incorporation of a 5‐kDa polyethylene glycol linker improves targeting to both tumor types relative to a short linker. It is concluded that the blood half‐life of a targeting molecule–nanomaterial ensemble is a key consideration when selecting the appropriate ligand and nanoparticle chemistry for tumor targeting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In vivo tumor targeting and spectroscopic detection with surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticle tags
Qian, X., Peng, X.-H., Ansari, D. O., Yin-Goen, Q., Chen, G. Z., Shin, D. M., Yang, L., Young, A. N., Wang, M. D., & Nie, S. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1377 · Cited by 2,201
Formulation of functionalized PLGA-PEG Nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery
Cheng, J., Teply, B. A., Sherifi, I., Sung, J., Luther, G., Gu, F. X., Levy-Nissenbaum, E., Radovic-Moreno, A. F., Langer, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.047 · Cited by 1,273
Cited by
Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery
Blanco, E., Shen, H., & Ferrari, M. (2015) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3330 · Cited by 7,002
Biological applications of magnetic nanoparticles
Colombo, M., Carregal-Romero, S., Casula, M. F., Gutiérrez, L., Morales, M. P., Böhm, I. B., Heverhagen, J. T., Prosperi, D., & Parak, W. J. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15337h · Cited by 1,315
Duan, X., & Li, Y. (2013) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201201390 · Cited by 926
Inspiration and application in the evolution of biomaterials
Huebsch, N., & Mooney, D. J. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08601 · Cited by 855
In vivo delivery, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles
Arami, H., Khandhar, A., Liggitt, D., & Krishnan, K. M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00541h · Cited by 830
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J., von Maltzahn, G., Zhang, L., Derfus, A. M., Simberg, D., Harris, T. J., Ruoslahti, E., Bhatia, S. N., & Sailor, M. J.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-20
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 694-700
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2152121678
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic Surface Engineering of Magnetic Nanoworms for In vivo Tumor Targeting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.200801789
- The paper
- Park, J., von Maltzahn, G., Zhang, L., Derfus, A. M., Simberg, D., Harris, T. J., Ruoslahti, E., Bhatia, S. N., & Sailor, M. J. (2009). Systematic Surface Engineering of Magnetic Nanoworms for In vivo Tumor Targeting. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.