Cited by 81Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchBone Tissue Engineering Materials

Uniform Beads with Controllable Pore Sizes for Biomedical Applications

Open access
Choi, Sung‐Wook, Yeh, Yi‐Chun, Zhang, Yu, Sung, Hsing‐Wen, Xia, Younan·2010·Small

Abstract

Uniform beads of poly(D,L-lactide-co- glycolide) with small or large pores are fabricated by selectively introducing phase-separated layers of an unstable emulsion into a fluidic device using a syringe with a tip offset from the barrel. When fibroblasts are cultured in the beads, a higher density of viable cells occurs in the beads with larger pores. These beads could be useful for tissue engineering and cell-delivery applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.201000544

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some important characteristics of cancer cells cannot be appropriately modeled in 2D cultures.

    “For instance, some important characteristics of cancer cells cannot be appropriately modeled in 2D cultures (22).”

    From Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture (2017) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Experimental Section describes culturing NIH-3T3 fibroblasts in porous beads, and the paper’s discussion of three-dimensional matrices concerns cell viability. Searches for cancer cells and comparisons with 2D cultures found no passage addressing whether 2D cultures inadequately model cancer-cell characteristics; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Senuma Y Franceschin S Hilborn JG Tissières P Bisson I Frey P Biomaterials 2000 21 1135 10817266

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, S., Yeh, Y., Zhang, Y., Sung, H., & Xia, Y.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • National Tsing Hua University (TW)
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-09
Volume
6
Issue
14
Pages
1492-1498
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W2136609878
Cited by
81
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Small (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000798)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Keywords
poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid), porous beads, pore size control, phase separation, fluidic devices, fibroblast culture, cell viability, tissue engineering, cell delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Emulsions, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Microscopy, Fluorescence, 3T3 Cells, Bioreactors, Hydrogels, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review