Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambient Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries

Manthiram, Arumugam, Yu, Xingwen·2015·Small

Abstract

Ambient‐ or room‐temperature sodium–sulfur batteries (RT Na–S) are gaining much attention as a low‐cost option for large‐scale electrical energy storage applications. However, their adoption is hampered by severe challenges. This concept paper summarizes first the operating principles, history, recent progress, and challenges of RT Na–S battery technology, and then suggests future directions towards enhancing performance in order for it to be a viable technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.201403257

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Manthiram, A., & Yu, X.
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-07
Volume
11
Issue
18
Pages
2108-2114
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W2098518102
Cited by
344
References
29
FWCI
12.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201403257
The paper
Manthiram, A., & Yu, X. (2015). Ambient Temperature Sodium–Sulfur Batteries. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201403257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.