The DOI matches its Crossref record; 294 of the 294 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications
Open accessAbstract
Over the last decades, the fabrication of 3D tissues has become commonplace in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. However, conventional 3D biofabrication techniques such as scaffolding, microengineering, and fiber and cell sheet engineering are limited in their capacity to fabricate complex tissue constructs with the required precision and controllability that is needed to replicate biologically relevant tissues. To this end, 3D bioprinting offers great versatility to fabricate biomimetic, volumetric tissues that are structurally and functionally relevant. It enables precise control of the composition, spatial distribution, and architecture of resulting constructs facilitating the recapitulation of the delicate shapes and structures of targeted organs and tissues. This Review systematically covers the history of bioprinting and the most recent advances in instrumentation and methods. It then focuses on the requirements for bioinks and cells to achieve optimal fabrication of biomimetic constructs. Next, emerging evolutions and future directions of bioprinting are discussed, such as freeform, high‐resolution, multimaterial, and 4D bioprinting. Finally, the translational potential of bioprinting and bioprinted tissues of various categories are presented and the Review is concluded by exemplifying commercially available bioprinting platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Blastocysts
Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A., Swiergiel, J. J., Marshall, V. S., & Jones, J. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1145 · Cited by 15,926
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Langer, R., & Vacanti, J. P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8493529 · Cited by 9,893
A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites
Huang, Z.-M., Zhang, Y.-Z., Kotaki, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2003) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00178-7 · Cited by 7,556
Self-citation3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy, S. V., & Atala, A. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2958 · Cited by 7,034
Electrospinning of Nanofibers: Reinventing the Wheel?
Li, D., & Xia, Y. (2004) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200400719 · Cited by 5,521
Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing
Ligon, S. C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M., & Mülhaupt, R. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 · Cited by 3,741
An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes
Crapo, P. M., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.057 · Cited by 3,591
Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels
Yue, K., Trujillo-de Santiago, G., Alvarez, M. M., Tamayol, A., Annabi, N., & Khademhosseini, A. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.045 · Cited by 3,146
Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4544 · Cited by 3,027
Cited by
Balla, E., Daniilidis, V., Karlioti, G., Kalamas, T., Stefanidou, M., Bikiaris, N. D., Vlachopoulos, A., Koumentakou, I., & Bikiaris, D. N. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13111822 · Cited by 655
Current applications of poly(lactic acid) composites in tissue engineering and drug delivery
Liu, S., Qin, S., He, M., Zhou, D., Qin, Q., & Wang, H. (2020) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108238 · Cited by 533
3D In Vitro Model (R)evolution: Unveiling Tumor–Stroma Interactions
Rodrigues, J., Heinrich, M. A., Teixeira, L. M., & Prakash, J. (2021) · Trends in Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.009 · Cited by 405
Self-citationZhang, Y. S., Haghiashtiani, G., Hübscher, T., Kelly, D. J., Lee, J. M., Lutolf, M., McAlpine, M. C., Yeong, W. Y., Zenobi-Wong, M., & Malda, J. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00073-8 · Cited by 391
Self-citationMaterials for Smart Soft Actuator Systems
Apsite, I., Salehi, S., & Ionov, L. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00453 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Heinrich, M. A., Liu, W., Jimenez, A., Yang, J., Akpek, A., Liu, X., Pi, Q., Mu, X., Hu, N., Schiffelers, R. M., Prakash, J., Xie, J., & Zhang, Y. S.
- Venue
- Small
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- e1805510-e1805510
- ISSN
- 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-6829
- OpenAlex
- W2943437279
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 294
- FWCI
- 17.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smll.201805510
- The paper
- Heinrich, M. A., Liu, W., Jimenez, A., Yang, J., Akpek, A., Liu, X., Pi, Q., Mu, X., Hu, N., Schiffelers, R. M., Prakash, J., Xie, J., & Zhang, Y. S. (2019). 3D Bioprinting: from Benches to Translational Applications. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201805510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.