Cited by 36Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Strain Effects in Ru‐Au Bimetallic Aerogels Boost Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Open access
Wei, Wei, Guo, Fei, Wang, Cui, Wang, Lingwei, Sheng, Zhizhi, Wu, Xiaodong, Cai, Bin, Eychmüller, Alexander·2024·Small

Abstract

Abstract To improve the sluggish kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), a key component in water‐splitting applications, there is an urgent desire to develop efficient, cost‐effective, and stable electrocatalysts. Strain engineering is proving an efficient strategy for increasing the catalytic activity of electrocatalysts. This work presents the development of Ru‐Au bimetallic aerogels by a simple one‐step in situ reduction‐gelation approach, which exhibits strain effects and electron transfer to create a remarkable HER activity and stability in an alkaline environment. The surface strain induced by the bimetallic segregated structure shifts the d ‐band center downward, enhancing catalysis by balancing the processes of water dissociation, OH* adsorption, and H* adsorption. Specifically, the optimized catalyst shows low overpotentials of only 24.1 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm −2 in alkaline electrolytes, surpassing commercial Pt/C. This study can contribute to the understanding of strain engineering in bimetallic electrocatalysts for HER at the atomic scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smll.202310603

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 5 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    Ru-Au bimetallic aerogels were synthesized by a one-step in situ reduction-gelation approach.

    “This work presents the development of Ru-Au bimetallic aerogels by a simple one-step in situ reduction-gelation approach, which exhibits strain effects and electron transfer to create a remarkable HER activity and stability in an alkaline environment.”
    • Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
      “Here, we successfully synthesized bimetallic Ru-Au aerogels to realize the dual-functional sites, with the RuAu 3 aerogel showing exceptional electrocatalytic performance for HER.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.1. Characterization of Ru-Au Aerogels · plain
      “The one-step gelation method was employed to synthesize the Ru-Au bimetallic aerogels.[42]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Ru doping causes the resolved lattice fringes for RuAu3 (111) to be slightly smaller than those of pure Au.

    “The Ru doping causes the resolved lattice fringes for RuAu 3 (111) to be slightly smaller than those of pure Au. [48]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] 48. W. Zhu, H. Yuan, F. Liao, Y. Shen, H. Shi, Y. Shi, L. Xu, M. Ma, M. Shao, Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124240.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Findingown data

    The RuAu3 aerogel achieves a Tafel slope of 36.7 mV dec-1 in alkaline electrolyte.

    “Specifically, it achieves a current density of 10 mA cm -2 at a low overpotential of 24.1 mV with a small Tafel slope of 36.7 mV dec -1 in alkaline electrolyte.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.2. HER Catalytic Performance · plain
      “Of all the samples, the RuAu 1 and RuAu 3 aerogels have the lowest Tafel slopes (32 and 36.7 mV dec -1 ), which indicates better reaction kinetics compared to the other samples.[14,27,59]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    TEM and EDS examinations revealed a phase-separated bimetallic skeletal aerogel.

    “This was confirmed by subsequent TEM and EDS examinations, which revealed a phaseseparated bimetallic skeletal aerogel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The significant reduction potential difference between Ru3+ and Au3+ (ΔE = 1.043 eV) resulted in different reduction rates.

    “Intriguingly, the significant reduction potential difference between Ru 3+ and Au 3+ (ΔE = 1.043 eV) resulted in different reduction rates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Ru experiences a tensile stress whereas Au experiences a compressive stress in RuAu3 aerogels.

    “As a result, Ru experiences a tensile stress whereas Au experiences a compressive stress in RuAu 3 aerogels.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.3. DFT Calculations · boosted
      “It is also confirmed that Ru experiences tensile strain, whereas Au undergoes compressive strain in the RuAu 3 aerogel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    DFT calculations revealed that the strain effect shifts the d-band upward and changes the local charge distribution of the Ru-Au aerogel.

    “Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the strain effect shifts the d-band upward and changes the local charge distribution of the Ru-Au aerogel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The RuAu3 aerogel's overpotential of 24.1 mV at 10 mA cm-2 is lower than that of commercial Pt/C and of Ru, RuAu1, RuAu6, and RuAu9 aerogels.

    “Specifically, the optimized catalyst shows low overpotentials of only 24.1 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm -2 in alkaline electrolytes, surpassing commercial Pt/C.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.2. HER Catalytic Performance · plain
      “Specifically, to reach a current density of 10 mA cm -2 , the RuAu 3 aerogel needs an overpotential (𝜂 10 ) of 24.1 mV, which is much lower than the 50.8, 38.8, 45.4, and 45.4 mV of Ru, RuAu 1 , RuAu 6 , RuAu 9 , and 32.5 mV of the commercial Pt/C (Figure 3a), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The lattice fringes of 0.237 nm, 0.234 nm, and 0.226 nm correspond to the (111), (111), and (100) lattice planes of Au, RuAu3, and Ru, respectively.

    “In the HRTEM images, distinct lattice fringes of 0.237 nm (Figure 1c,d), 0.234 nm (Figure 1e,f), and 0.226 nm (Figure 1h,i) were identified.These lattice fringes correspond to the (111), (111), and (100) lattice planes of Au, RuAu 3 , and Ru, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When the gold content is three times that of ruthenium, a noticeable shift of the Au 4f peaks towards lower binding energies by 1.15 eV occurs, indicating an electron-deficient state of Ru sites due to electron transfer from Ru atoms to Au atoms.

    “Obviously, when the gold content is three times that of ruthenium, a noticeable shift of the Au 4f peaks towards lower binding energies by 1.15 eV occurs, indicating an electron-deficient state of Ru sites due to the electron transfer from Ru atoms to Au atoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The RuAu3 aerogel needs an overpotential of 24.1 mV to reach 10 mA cm-2, which is lower than Ru (50.8 mV), RuAu1 (38.8 mV), RuAu6 (45.4 mV), RuAu9 (45.4 mV), and commercial Pt/C (32.5 mV).

    “Specifically, to reach a current density of 10 mA cm -2 , the RuAu 3 aerogel needs an overpotential (𝜂 10 ) of 24.1 mV, which is much lower than the 50.8, 38.8, 45.4, and 45.4 mV of Ru, RuAu 1 , RuAu 6 , RuAu 9 , and 32.5 mV of the commercial Pt/C (Figure 3a), respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The microscopic strain for Ru was determined as e = 0.90546 and for Au as e = 0.68132.

    “The microscopic strain for Ru was determined as e = 0.90546 and for Au as e = 0.68132 (Figure 2g).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The EDS element ratio of Ru to Au is much higher than the initial feed ratio, meaning that ruthenium is slowly reduced and therefore tends to gel on the surface.

    “From the EDS data, the element ratio of Ru to Au is much higher than the initial feed ratio, which means that ruthenium is slowly reduced and therefore tends to gel on the surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Ru-Au bimetallic aerogels exhibit strain effects and electron transfer.

    “This work presents the development of Ru-Au bimetallic aerogels by a simple one-step in situ reduction-gelation approach, which exhibits strain effects and electron transfer to create a remarkable HER activity and stability in an alkaline environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The BET surface area of the RuAu3 aerogel is 72 m2 g-1 with a pore volume of 0.23 cm3 g-1 and an average pore diameter of 9 nm.

    “The BET surface area of the RuAu 3 aerogel is 72 m 2 g -1 with a pore volume of 0.23 cm 3 g -1 , and it shows a wide range of pore sizes representing mesopores and macropores with an average pore diameter of 9 nm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The d-band centers of Au(111), Ru(001), and RuAu3(111) are calculated to be at -3.21, -1.68, and -3.09 eV, respectively.

    “The locations of the d-band centers are calculated to be at -3.21, -1.68, and -3.09 eV, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    RuAu3 exhibited the highest capacitance of 61.4 mF cm-2 in alkaline solution, exceeding commercial Pt/C (13.0 mF cm-2), RuAu1 (47.7 mF cm-2), and Ru (18.9 mF cm-2).

    “According to Figure 3d, RuAu 3 exhibited the highest capacitance of 61.4 mF cm -2 in alkaline solution, exceeding even that of commercial Pt/C (13.0 mF cm -2 ), RuAu 1 (47.7 mF cm -2 ), and Ru (18.9 mF cm -2 ).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The mass activities of Ru, RuAu1, RuAu6, and RuAu9 aerogels are approximately 0.56, 3.44, 2.35, and 0.03 A g metal-1 at 100 mV, respectively.

    “In addition, the mass activities of Ru, RuAu 1 , RuAu 6 , and RuAu 9 aerogels are ≈ 0.56, 3.44, 2.35, and 0.03 A g metal -1 at 100 mV, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    RuAu3(111) exhibits lattice constants of a = b = 5.57 Å, resulting in a strain of -0.45% relative to Au(111) with a = b = 5.59 Å.

    “While Au (111) has lattice constants of a = b = 5.59 Å, RuAu 3 (111) exhibits lattice constants of a = b = 5.57Å, resulting in a strain of -0.45%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The Gibbs free energy of water dissociation for RuAu increases by only -0.21 eV, which is lower than that of the Au (1.79 eV) model.

    “The Gibbs free energy of water dissociation for the RuAu increases by only -0.21 eV, which is lower than that of the Au (1.79 eV) model (Figure S20, Supporting Information).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Electrochemical characterizations revealed that tensile strain in the RuAu x aerogels resulted in an improved interaction with both H reactive intermediates and OH spectator species, hence enhancing the total HER activity.

    “Electrochemical characterizations revealed that tensile strain in the RuAu x aerogels resulted in an improved interaction with both H reactive intermediates and OH spectator species, hence enhancing the total HER activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Au3+ should be reduced faster than Ru3+, making it challenging to form an alloy structure.

    “Theoretically, Au 3+ should be reduced faster than Ru 3+ , making it challenging to form an alloy structure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The improvement in the electrocatalytic activity of the RuAu3 aerogel can be attributed to the addition of Au (higher conductivity), synergy effects, and strain effects.

    “The improvement in the electrocatalytic activity of the RuAu 3 aerogel can be attributed to the addition of Au (higher conductivity), synergy effects, and strain effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Doping Ru in Au results in compressive strain making Ru more susceptible to electron loss and shifting the d-band center closer to the Fermi energy level.

    “According to this first-principle analysis, doping Ru in Au results in compressive strain making Ru more susceptible to electron loss and shifting the d-band center closer to the Fermi energy level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The d-band center of RuAu3 is positioned below that of Au, indicating that the intermediates on the RuAu3 site have higher adsorption energy.

    “The d-band center of RuAu 3 is positioned below that of Au, indicating that the intermediates on the RuAu 3 site have higher adsorption energy (Figure 4a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    DFT calculations confirmed that the lattice strain between Ru and Au metal elements accelerated water dissociation and weakened *H adsorption.

    “DFT calculations also confirmed that the lattice strain between Ru and Au metal elements accelerated water dissociation and weakened *H adsorption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.
21 of 21
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gold is an inert metal with poor hydrogen adsorption capabilities.

    “Gold, in particular, is recognized as an inert metal with poor hydrogen adsorption capabilities, which can counterbalance the strong hydrogen adsorption properties of the Ru matrix.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The four-layer RuAu3(111) slab model represents the catalytically active surface of the RuAu3 aerogel.

    “Slab models for the Au (111) and Ru (001) faces, each requiring four layers of atoms, were constructed.RuAu 3 (111) was created by doping a Ru atom into the first layer of Au (111).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ru has a much lower price than Pt and strong corrosion resistance in alkaline environments.

    “and 2) much lower price than Pt, coupled with strong corrosion resistance in alkaline environments.[ 11 , 12 , 13 ]”

    From Tuning the Adsorption of H and OH on Ruthenium Aerogel to Boost the Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction says Ru costs about 1/25 as much as Pt, supporting the price comparison. Section 2.2 reports long-term stability in alkaline solution for a Ru–Au aerogel, but does not establish strong corrosion resistance for Ru itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior studies of Ru aerogels predominantly yielded the hcp phase as the more stable form.

    “Prior studies of Ru aerogels predominantly yielded the hcp phase as the more stable form.[ 11 , 12 , 13 ]”

    From Tuning the Adsorption of H and OH on Ruthenium Aerogel to Boost the Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 2.1 (page unavailable) says the diffraction peaks of this paper’s monolithic Ru aerogel align with metallic Ru. It does not identify an hcp phase, compare phase stability, or say that prior Ru-aerogel studies predominantly yielded hcp Ru. Searches for hcp and hexagonal close-packed Ru did not locate such a passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Element maps are described as both uneven and even

    Major

    One description says Ru and Au are unevenly distributed in the element maps; another says the EDS maps show them evenly distributed.

  • The aerogel formula is reversed in the diffraction description

    Minor

    The text identifies the aerogel examined in Figure 1k as AuRu 3, whereas the figure caption identifies the same diffraction pattern as RuAu 3. Those formulas specify different metal ratios.

  • The stated d-band ordering reverses the reported values

    Minor

    The listed center for RuAu 3 is −3.09 eV, which is above Au's −3.21 eV, not below it.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Wang J., 2020, Adv. Funct. Mater., 31
  2. Chen C. H., 2019, Adv. Energy Mater., 9
  3. 10.1021/acsami.0c14007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/s41467-020-15391-w · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, W., Guo, F., Wang, C., Wang, L., Sheng, Z., Wu, X., Cai, B., & Eychmüller, A.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Cai, Bin
  • Eychmüller, Alexander
Venue
Small
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-26
Volume
20
Issue
25
Pages
e2310603-e2310603
ISSN
  • 1613-6810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-6829
OpenAlex
W4391282243
Cited by
36
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 8
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Small (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21607063, 52201262)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG EY 16/30‐1, CRC 1415, RTG 2767)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2023YQ039, ZR2022QE001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
hydrogen evolution reaction, strain engineering, surface strain, d-band center, alkaline water electrolysis, electrocatalyst stability, platinum-free electrocatalysts, water splitting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review