The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Toolbox for Lithium–Sulfur Battery Research: Methods and Protocols
Abstract
Favorable characteristics, such as high energy density, cost efficiency, and environmental benignity, render lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries a promising candidate to meet the increasing demand for efficient and economic energy‐storage systems. Many efforts have been devoted to and much progress has been achieved in Li–S‐battery research from both the scientific and technological viewpoints. Various tools, methods, and protocols have been developed for Li–S‐battery research. Here, these advancements are summarized, from spectroscopic to electrochemical techniques, and the landscape of Li–S chemistry is painted from reactions to transport phenomena. The aim is to provide a comprehensive toolbox for Li–S‐battery research and spur future development in multi‐electron chemistry, multiphase conversion, and related energy‐storage systems and fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Wang, Z., Dong, Y., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Bin Wu, H., Hao, C., Liu, S., Qiu, J., & Lou, X. W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6002 · Cited by 1,059
Michan, A. L., Parimalam, B. S., Leskes, M., Kerber, R. N., Yoon, T., Grey, C. P., & Lucht, B. L. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02282 · Cited by 541
Investigations of lithium–sulfur batteries using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
Cañas, N. A., Hirose, K., Pascucci, B., Wagner, N., Friedrich, K. A., & Hiesgen, R. (2013) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2013.02.101 · Cited by 415
Cited by
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Emerging Catalysts to Promote Kinetics of Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Wang, P., Xi, B., Huang, M., Chen, W., Feng, J., & Xiong, S. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202002893 · Cited by 451
A Review of Functional Binders in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Yuan, H., Huang, J., Peng, H., Titirici, M., Xiang, R., Chen, R., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201802107 · Cited by 438
Self-citationNg, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
A Review on the Features and Progress of Dual‐Ion Batteries
Wang, M., & Tang, Y. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201703320 · Cited by 363
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, G., Zhang, Z., Peng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q.
- Venue
- Small Methods
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-06-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 2366-9608 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2625173634
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Toolbox for Lithium–Sulfur Battery Research: Methods and Protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/smtd.201700134
- The paper
- Zhang, G., Zhang, Z., Peng, H., Huang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2017). A Toolbox for Lithium–Sulfur Battery Research: Methods and Protocols. Small Methods. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
