Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations

Open access
Cao, Liyuan, Li, Chunxiang·2019·Structural Control and Health Monitoring

Abstract

By integrating the tuned tandem mass dampers (TTMD) with two inerters, the tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters (TTMDI) with high effectiveness and wide frequency spacing (i.e., high robustness) have been proposed in this paper. It is expected that the frequency spacing of the TTMDI will be comparable with that of the multiple tuned mass dampers. In order to reveal the fundamental performance of the TTMDI, it is attached to a single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure under random Gaussian white noise base excitations. Closed-form expressions for calculating the dimensionless displacement variances are thereupon derived for the SDOF structure–TTMDI system. The optimization criterion is determined as the minimization of the dimensionless displacement variances. Employing the gradient-based optimization technique, the effects of varying the key parameters on the performance of the TTMDI are scrutinized in order to probe into its superiority. Evaluation of the performance of the TTMDI includes that of its effectiveness, strokes, stiffness, damping coefficient, distributions of the inertance coefficients, frequency spacing, and frequency response of the controlled structure. For purposes of further comparison, the optimum results of the TTMD and tuned mass damper-inerter (TMDI) are also included into consideration. Results clearly demonstrate that the TTMDI outperforms both the TTMD and TMDI because of several advantages, particularly high effectiveness and broadband characteristics. Therefore, the TTMDI is deemed to be a broadband high effectiveness control device. Furthermore, the TTMDI only needs a linking dashpot and is capable of decentralizing a large inertance coefficient, thus showing its simplicity and easier implementation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/stc.2319

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Chung, 2013, Optimal design formulas for viscous tuned mass dampers in wind-excited structures, Struct Control Health Monit, 20, 320, 10.1002/stc.496 · DOI
  2. Lu, 2017, Improving performance of a super tall building using a new eddy-current tuned mass damper, Struct Control Health Monit, 24, e1882, 10.1002/stc.1882 · DOI
  3. Gu, 1994, A practical method of TMD for suppressing wind-induced vertical buffeting of long-span cable-stayed bridges and its application, J Wind Eng Ind Aerod, 51, 203, 10.1016/0167-6105(94)90004-3 · DOI
  4. Gu, 1998, Increase of critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges using tuned mass dampers, J Wind Eng Ind Aerod, 73, 111, 10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00282-1 · DOI
  5. Domaneschi, 2015, Control of wind buffeting vibrations in a suspension bridge by TMD: hybridization and robustness issues, Comput Struct, 155, 3, 10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.02.031 · DOI
  6. Tributsch, 2012, Evaluation and analytical approximation of tuned mass damper performance in an earthquake environment, Smart Struct Syst, 10, 155, 10.12989/sss.2012.10.2.155 · DOI
  7. Jangid, 1995, Dynamic characteristics of structures with multiple tuned mass dampers, Struct Eng Mech, 3, 497, 10.12989/sem.1995.3.5.497 · DOI
  8. Jangid, 1999, Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 28, 1041, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::AID-EQE853>3.0.CO;2-E · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::aid-eqe853>3.0.co;2-e
  9. Li, 2000, Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillations of structures under the ground acceleration, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 29, 1405, 10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1405::AID-EQE976>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Li, 2002, Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration based on DDMF and ADMF, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 31, 897, 10.1002/eqe.128 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Li, 2003, Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for structures under ground acceleration based on the uniform distribution of system parameters, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 32, 671, 10.1002/eqe.239 · DOI
  12. Casciati, 2009, Performance of multi-TMD in the towers of suspension bridges, J Vib Control, 15, 821, 10.1177/1077546308091455 · DOI
  13. Lin, 2010, Optimum design and experimental study of multiple tuned mass dampers with limited stroke, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 39, 1631, 10.1002/eqe.1008 · DOI
  14. Han, 2008, Characteristics of linearly distributed parameter-based multiple-tuned mass dampers, Struct Control Health Monit, 15, 839, 10.1002/stc.222 · DOI
  15. Jokic, 2011, Reduced-order multiple tuned mass damper optimization: a bounded real lemma for descriptor systems approach, J Sound Vib, 330, 5259, 10.1016/j.jsv.2011.06.005 · DOI
  16. Daniel, 2012, Multiple-tuned mass dampers for multimodal control of pedestrian bridges, J Struct Eng ASCE, 138, 1173, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000527 · DOI
  17. Mohebbi, 2013, Designing optimal multiple tuned mass dampers using genetic algorithms (GAs) for mitigating the seismic response of structures, J Vib Control, 19, 605, 10.1177/1077546311434520 · DOI
  18. Fadel Miguel, 2016, A novel approach to the optimum design of MTMDs under seismic excitations, Struct Control Health Monit, 23, 1290, 10.1002/stc.1845 · DOI
  19. Bozer, 2018, Free parameter search of multiple tuned mass dampers by using artificial bee colony algorithm, Struct. Control Health Monit, 25, e2066, 10.1002/stc.2066 · DOI
  20. Sun, 2013, Hardening Düffing oscillator attenuation using a nonlinear TMD, a semi-active TMD and multiple TMD, J Sound Vib, 332, 674, 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.10.016 · DOI
  21. Eason, 2013, Attenuation of a linear oscillator using a nonlinear and a semi-active tuned mass damper in series, J Sound Vib, 332, 154, 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.048 · DOI
  22. Luo, 2014, Realization of a strongly nonlinear vibration-mitigation device using elastomeric bumpers, J Eng Mech ASCE, 140, 04014009, 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000692 · DOI
  23. Li, 2006, Estimating double tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration using a novel optimum criterion, J Sound Vib, 298, 280, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.018 · DOI
  24. Yang, 2017, Performance of tuned tandem mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration, Struct Control Health Monit, 24, e1974, 10.1002/stc.1974 · DOI
  25. Chen, 2015, Realization of three-port spring networks with inerter for effective mechanical control, IEEE Trans Autom Contr, 60, 2722, 10.1109/TAC.2015.2394875 · DOI
  26. Chen, 2013, Realization of a special class of admittances with one damper and one inerter for mechanical control, IEEE Trans AutomContr, 58, 1841
  27. Chen, 2009, The missing mechanical circuit element, IEEE Circuits Syst Mag, 9, 10, 10.1109/MCAS.2008.931738 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Wang, 2011, Designing and testing a hydraulic inerter, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci, 225, 66, 10.1243/09544062JMES2199 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ikago, 2012, Seismic control of single-degree-of-freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 41, 453, 10.1002/eqe.1138 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Saitoh, 2012, On the performance of gyro-mass devices for displacement mitigation in base isolation systems, Struct Control Health Monit, 19, 246, 10.1002/stc.419 · DOI
  31. Lazar, 2014, Using an inerter-based device for structural vibration suppression, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 43, 1129, 10.1002/eqe.2390 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Pietrosanti, 2017, Optimal design and performance evaluation of systems with tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI), Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 46, 1367, 10.1002/eqe.2861 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Giaralis, 2017, Wind-induced vibration mitigation in tall buildings using the tuned mass-damper-inerter, J Struct Eng ASCE, 143, 04017127, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001863 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Domenico, 2018, An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI), Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 47, 1169, 10.1002/eqe.3011 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Giaralis, 2018, Optimal tuned mass-damper-inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria, Struct Control Health Monit, 25, e2082, 10.1002/stc.2082 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Wen, 2017, Design and evaluation of tuned inerter-based dampers for the seismic control of MDOF structures, J Struct Eng ASCE, 143, 04016207, 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001680 · DOI
  37. Asai, 2017, Outrigger tuned inertial mass electromagnetic transducers for high-rise buildings subject to long period earthquakes, Eng Struct, 153, 404, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.040 · DOI
  38. Spanos, 1983, Spectral moments calculation of linear system output, J Appl Mech ASME, 50, 901, 10.1115/1.3167169 · doi:10.1115/1.3167169
  39. Schmelzer, 2010, Efficiency of tuned mass dampers with uncertain parameters on the performance of structures under stochastic excitation, Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part O: J Risk Reliab, 224, 297
  40. Oliva, 2017, Optimal design of nonlinear energy sinks for SDOF structures subjected to white noise base excitations, Eng Struct, 145, 135, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.03.027 · DOI
  41. Kim, 2018, Optimum design of linear multiple tuned mass dampers subjected to white-noise base acceleration considering practical configurations, Eng Struct, 171, 516, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.002 · DOI
  42. Anajafi, 2018, Robust design of a multi-floor isolation system, Struct Control Health Monit, 25, e2130, 10.1002/stc.2130 · DOI
  43. Anajafi, 2018, Partial mass isolation system for seismic vibration control of buildings, Struct Control Health Monit, 25, e2088, 10.1002/stc.2088 · DOI
  44. Anajafi, 2018, Comparison of the seismic performance of a partial mass isolation technique with conventional TMD and base-isolation systems under broad-band and narrow-band excitations, Eng Struct, 158, 110, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.018 · DOI
  45. Garrido, 2013, Improvement of tuned mass damper by using rotational inertia through tuned viscous mass damper, Eng Struct, 56, 2149, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.044 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Cao, L., & Li, C.
Venue
Structural Control and Health Monitoring
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-04
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
e2319
ISSN
1545-2255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2914927050
Cited by
201
References
4
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/stc.2319
The paper
Cao, L., & Li, C. (2019). Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2319

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.