The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activin/Nodal Signaling Controls Divergent Transcriptional Networks in Human Embryonic Stem Cells and in Endoderm Progenitors
Abstract
Activin/Nodal signaling is necessary to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and to induce their differentiation toward endoderm. However, the mechanisms by which Activin/Nodal signaling achieves these opposite functions remain unclear. To unravel these mechanisms, we examined the transcriptional network controlled in hESCs by Smad2 and Smad3, which represent the direct effectors of Activin/Nodal signaling. These analyses reveal that Smad2/3 participate in the control of the core transcriptional network characterizing pluripotency, which includes Oct-4, Nanog, FoxD3, Dppa4, Tert, Myc, and UTF1. In addition, similar experiments performed on endoderm cells confirm that a broad part of the transcriptional network directing differentiation is downstream of Smad2/3. Therefore, Activin/Nodal signaling appears to control divergent transcriptional networks in hESCs and in endoderm. Importantly, we observed an overlap between the transcriptional network downstream of Nanog and Smad2/3 in hESCs; whereas, functional studies showed that both factors cooperate to control the expression of pluripotency genes. Therefore, the effect of Activin/Nodal signaling on pluripotency and differentiation could be dictated by tissue specific Smad2/3 partners such as Nanog, explaining the mechanisms by which signaling pathways can orchestrate divergent cell fate decisions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
Making a commitment: cell lineage allocation and axis patterning in the early mouse embryo
Arnold, S. J., & Robertson, E. J. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2618 · Cited by 816
Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo
Wei, G., Badis, G., Berger, M. F., Kivioja, T., Palin, K., Enge, M., Bonke, M., Jolma, A., Varjosalo, M., Gehrke, A. R., et al. (2010) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2010.106 · Cited by 568
Cited by
The Cell-Cycle State of Stem Cells Determines Cell Fate Propensity
Pauklin, S., & Vallier, L. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.031 · Cited by 623
Self-citationThe TGFbeta Superfamily Signaling Pathway
Weiss, A., & Attisano, L. (2013) · WIREs Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.86 · Cited by 561
Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq
Blakeley, P., Fogarty, N. M. E., del Valle, I., Wamaitha, S. E., Hu, T. X., Elder, K., Snell, P., Christie, L., Robson, P., & Niakan, K. K. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.123547 · Cited by 466
Structural determinants of Smad function in TGF-β signaling
Macias, M. J., Martin-Malpartida, P., & Massagué, J. (2015) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2015.03.012 · Cited by 372
Beyer, T. A., Weiss, A., Khomchuk, Y., Huang, K., Ogunjimi, A. A., Varelas, X., & Wrana, J. L. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.021 · Cited by 292
Activin/nodal signalling in stem cells
Pauklin, S., & Vallier, L. (2015) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.091769 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, S., Teo, A., Pauklin, S., Hannan, N., Cho, C. H.-H., Lim, B., Vardy, L., Dunn, N. R., Trotter, M., Pedersen, R., & Vallier, L.
- Venue
- Stem Cells
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-26
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1176-1185
- ISSN
- 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-4918
- OpenAlex
- W2036233315
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.