Cited by 15Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Prepubertal castration causes the age‐dependent changes in hippocampal long‐term potentiation

Moradpour, Farshad, Fathollahi, Yaghoub, Naghdi, Nasser, Hosseinmardi, Nargess, Javan, Mohammad·2013·Synapse

Abstract

The effects of prepubertal castration on hippocampal CA3-CA1 synaptic transmission and plasticity were studied at different ages in vitro. The field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSP) and population spikes (PS) were simultaneously recorded from stratum radiatum and stratum pylamidale of area CA1 following stimulation of Schaffer collaterals in slices taken from sham-castrated and castrated rats at postnatal days (PND) 28, 35, 45, and 60. Castration had no effect on baseline responses at different ages except at PND 60 that a decrease in the fEPSP slope was seen. Prepubertal castration caused age-specific changes in CA1-long term potentiation (LTP) induction. The castration did decrease both fEPSP-LTP and PS-LTP at PND 35 but a decrease was seen only in PS-LTP at PND 60. NMDA receptor antagonist AP5 (25 µM) completely blocked both fEPSP-LTP and PS-LTP at PND 60 and only PS-LTP at PND 35 in both sham-castrated and castrated groups. Although AP5 blocked fEPSP-LTP at PND 35 in sham-castrated group, it failed to inhibit fEPSP-LTP at PND 35 in castrated one. These findings suggest that prepubertal castration causes the age-dependent changes in CA1-LTP induction, which might arise from alterations in the NMDA receptors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.21636

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moradpour, F., Fathollahi, Y., Naghdi, N., Hosseinmardi, N., & Javan, M.
Affiliations
  • Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
  • Pasteur Institute of Iran (IR)
  • Department of Physiology Medical School Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Evin, Tehran Iran
Corresponding author
Fathollahi, Yaghoub
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-14
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
235-244
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W1556898659
Cited by
15
References
4
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
hippocampal long-term potentiation, CA1, CA3-CA1 synapses, NMDA receptor, AP5, field excitatory postsynaptic potentials, population spike, Schaffer collaterals, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Animals, Male, Orchiectomy, Sexual Maturation, 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, CA1 Region, Hippocampal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review