The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography
Abstract
Using conventional autoradiographic and tissue counting techniques, the experimental quantitation of in vivo kinetics of prospective or established radioligands for PET is animal and labour intensive. The present study tested the feasibility of using PET itself to quantitate the specific binding of [11 C] raclopride to rat striatum and to study the effects of experimental manipulation of endogenous dopamine on binding parameters. Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride was given i. v. to anaesthetised rats, positioned in a PET camera and dynamic emission scans acquired over 60 min. Time‐activity curves were generated for selected regions of interest, representing striatum and cerebellum and the striatal data fitted to a compartmental model, using cerebellum as the input function, thus circumventing the need for individual metabolite‐corrected plasma curves. In control rats, the binding potential (BP), defined as the ratio of the rate constants for transfer from “free to bound” and “bound to free” compartments, was of the order of 0.6. This was reduced threefold by predosing with nonraioactive raclopride. Increasing extracellular dopamine levels by predosing with d ‐amphetamine resulted in a significant decrease in BP whereas reducing extracellular dopamine by predosing with γ‐butyrolactone caused a significant increase. Thus, despite the limitation in spatial resolution of PET, specific binding of raclopride could be assessed from regional time‐activity curves from individual rats. The system was sufficiently sensitive that changes in BP could be detected following modulation of endogenous dopamine levels, a finding of potential relevance to the interpretation of clinical PET data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game
Koepp, M. J., Gunn, R. N., Lawrence, A. D., Cunningham, V. J., Dagher, A., Jones, T., Brooks, D. J., Bench, C. J., & Grasby, P. M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30498 · Cited by 1,279
Self-citationBreier, A., Su, T.-P., Saunders, R., Carson, R. E., Kolachana, B. S., de Bartolomeis, A., Weinberger, D. R., Weisenfeld, N., Malhotra, A. K., Eckelman, W. C., et al. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.6.2569 · Cited by 1,154
Parametric Imaging of Ligand-Receptor Binding in PET Using a Simplified Reference Region Model
Gunn, R. N., Lammertsma, A. A., Hume, S. P., & Cunningham, V. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0303 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationImaging Synaptic Neurotransmission with in Vivo Binding Competition Techniques: A Critical Review
Laruelle, M. (2000) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-200003000-00001 · Cited by 944
Klunk, W. E., Bacskai, B. J., Mathis, C. A., Kajdasz, S. T., McLellan, M. E., Frosch, M. P., Debnath, M. L., Holt, D. P., Wang, Y., & Hyman, B. T. (2002) · Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1093/jnen/61.9.797 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Hume, S. P., Myers, R., Bloomfield, P. M., Opacka‐Juffry, J., Cremer, J. E., Ahier, R. G., Luthra, S. K., Brooks, D. J., & Lammertsma, A. A.
- Venue
- Synapse
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-54
- ISSN
- 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2396
- OpenAlex
- W2080813404
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/syn.890120106
- The paper
- Hume, S. P., Myers, R., Bloomfield, P. M., Opacka‐Juffry, J., Cremer, J. E., Ahier, R. G., Luthra, S. K., Brooks, D. J., & Lammertsma, A. A. (1992). Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography. Synapse. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.890120106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.