Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography

Hume, Susan P., Myers, Ralph, Bloomfield, Peter M., Opacka‐Juffry, Jolanta, Cremer, Jill E., Ahier, Randall G., Luthra, Sajinda K., Brooks, David J., Lammertsma, Adriaan A.·1992·Synapse

Abstract

Using conventional autoradiographic and tissue counting techniques, the experimental quantitation of in vivo kinetics of prospective or established radioligands for PET is animal and labour intensive. The present study tested the feasibility of using PET itself to quantitate the specific binding of [11 C] raclopride to rat striatum and to study the effects of experimental manipulation of endogenous dopamine on binding parameters. Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride was given i. v. to anaesthetised rats, positioned in a PET camera and dynamic emission scans acquired over 60 min. Time‐activity curves were generated for selected regions of interest, representing striatum and cerebellum and the striatal data fitted to a compartmental model, using cerebellum as the input function, thus circumventing the need for individual metabolite‐corrected plasma curves. In control rats, the binding potential (BP), defined as the ratio of the rate constants for transfer from “free to bound” and “bound to free” compartments, was of the order of 0.6. This was reduced threefold by predosing with nonraioactive raclopride. Increasing extracellular dopamine levels by predosing with d ‐amphetamine resulted in a significant decrease in BP whereas reducing extracellular dopamine by predosing with γ‐butyrolactone caused a significant increase. Thus, despite the limitation in spatial resolution of PET, specific binding of raclopride could be assessed from regional time‐activity curves from individual rats. The system was sufficiently sensitive that changes in BP could be detected following modulation of endogenous dopamine levels, a finding of potential relevance to the interpretation of clinical PET data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.890120106

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Hume, S. P., Myers, R., Bloomfield, P. M., Opacka‐Juffry, J., Cremer, J. E., Ahier, R. G., Luthra, S. K., Brooks, D. J., & Lammertsma, A. A.
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-09
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
47-54
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W2080813404
Cited by
195
References
0
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/syn.890120106
The paper
Hume, S. P., Myers, R., Bloomfield, P. M., Opacka‐Juffry, J., Cremer, J. E., Ahier, R. G., Luthra, S. K., Brooks, D. J., & Lammertsma, A. A. (1992). Quantitation of Carbon‐11‐labeled raclopride in rat striatum using positron emission tomography. Synapse. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.890120106

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.