Cited by 1,279Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game

Koepp, M. J., Gunn, R. N., Lawrence, A. D., Cunningham, V. J., Dagher, A., Jones, T., Brooks, D. J., Bench, C. J. +1 more·1998·Nature

Abstract

Dopaminergic neurotransmission may be involved in learning, reinforcement of behaviour, attention, and sensorimotor integration. Binding of the radioligand 11C-labelled raclopride to dopamine D2 receptors is sensitive to levels of endogenous dopamine, which can be released by pharmacological challenge. Here we use 11C-labelled raclopride and positron emission tomography scans to provide evidence that endogenous dopamine is released in the human striatum during a goal-directed motor task, namely a video game. Binding of raclopride to dopamine receptors in the striatum was significantly reduced during the video game compared with baseline levels of binding, consistent with increased release and binding of dopamine to its receptors. The reduction in binding of raclopride in the striatum positively correlated with the performance level during the task and was greatest in the ventral striatum. These results show, to our knowledge for the first time, behavioural conditions under which dopamine is released in humans, and illustrate the ability of positron emission tomography to detect neurotransmitter fluxes in vivo during manipulations of behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/30498

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaming increases the release of striatal dopamine, promoting long-term potentiation of neural connections within the striatum, which is suggested to improve motivation and one's ability to learn.

    “Gaming increases the release of striatal dopamine [47], [48], promoting long-term potentiation of neural connections within the striatum [49], which is suggested to improve motivation and one’s ability to learn [50] (e.g., during EF training).”
  • The hypothesis that gamification explains the compliance difference is consistent with previous findings of increased time-on-training when EF training was gamified and with the finding that gaming increases the release of striatal dopamine, which is associated with increased motivation to continue playing and performing.

    “This hypothesis is consistent with previous findings of increased time-on-training when EF training was gamified [45] (also see [40]), and with the finding that gaming increases the release of striatal dopamine [47], [48], which is associated with increased motivation to continue playing and performing [50].”
  • PET studies showed that reward leads to dopamine release in the striatum and more specifically in the NAc, as indicated by reduction of binding potential of dopamine receptor subtype 2 using [11C] raclopride.

    “It was shown in positron emission tomography (PET) studies that reward leads to dopamine release in the striatum and more specifically in the NAc as indicated by reduction of the binding potential of the dopamine receptor subtype 2 using the radioligand [11C] raclopride (Koepp et al., 1998; Zald et al., 2004; Jonasson et al., 2014).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Koepp et al., 1998

  • Positive game-playing experiences trigger release of hormones such as endorphins and striatal dopamine that are responsible for feelings of pleasure and well-being.

    “Evidence from neuropsychological research further suggests the therapeutic value of game-based digital interventions in depression therapy, finding that positive game-playing experiences trigger the release of hormones such as endorphins and striatal dopamine7,8 that are responsible for feelings of pleasure and well-being.9,10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koepp, M. J., Gunn, R. N., Lawrence, A. D., Cunningham, V. J., Dagher, A., Jones, T., Brooks, D. J., Bench, C. J., & Grasby, P. M.
Affiliations
Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Grasby, P. M.
Venue
Nature
Published
1998-05
Volume
393
Issue
6682
Pages
266-268
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2110771878
Cited by
1,279
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 66 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 61
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
striatal dopamine release, endogenous dopamine, [11C]raclopride, dopamine D2 receptor binding, video game performance, ventral striatum, human brain imaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Salicylamides, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Dopamine Antagonists, Video Games, Raclopride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review