Cited by 175Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatmentReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Variability in D2‐dopamine receptor density and affinity: A PET study with [11C]raclopride in man

Farde, Lars, Hall, Håkan, Pauli, Stefan, Halldin, Christer·1995·Synapse

Abstract

The variability of D 2‐dopamine receptor binding parameters in man was determined using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and [11 C]raclopride. A saturation analysis based on five PET‐experiments was performed in each of ten men and ten women. The mean density of D 2‐dopamine receptors (B max) was 28 ± 6.9 pmol/ml (mean ± S.D.) and the apparent affinity (K dapp)9.1 ± 1.9 pmol/ml. The Hill coefficient was in all subjects close to unity (n H: 0.999 ± 0.020), thereby indicating binding to a homogeneous class of receptors. No significant differences between males and females were found in B max or K dapp. The interindividual difference in B max was statistically significant (α = 0.01). The difference in K dapp was not significant. Upregulation of the receptor density (B max) has been widely discussed as a mechanism for increased dopaminergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia. This study indicates that receptor density varies considerably in a group of healthy subjects. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/syn.890200303

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between wrist temperature and extrapyramidal disease is likely modulated by the high degree of inter-individual variability in dopamine D2 receptor density, which, with its role in central thermoregulation, may lead to the high association of wrist temperature for susceptibility to extrapyramidal disease.

    “This relationship is likely modulated by the high degree of inter-individual variability in dopamine D2 receptor density37, which, with its role in central thermoregulation, may lead to the high association of wrist temperature for susceptibility to extrapyramidal disease.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farde, L., Hall, H., Pauli, S., & Halldin, C.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Synapse
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-07
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
200-208
ISSN
  • 0887-4476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2396
OpenAlex
W2090291844
Cited by
175
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Synapse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01mh041205-09a1)
  • National Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH41205-08)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
dopamine D2 receptor, receptor density, receptor binding affinity, [11C]raclopride, interindividual variability, saturation analysis, Hill coefficient, sex differences, healthy volunteers, schizophrenia, receptor up-regulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aging, Brain, Brain Chemistry, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Methylation, Salicylamides, Sex Characteristics, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Antagonists, Raclopride

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review