The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners
Abstract
The traditional approach to the education of language minority students separates English language development from content instruction because it is assumed that English language proficiency is a prerequisite for subject matter learning. The authors of this article take the alternate view that the integration of inquiry science and language acquisition enhances learning in both domains. The report describes a conceptual framework for science–language integration and the development of a five‐level rubric to assess teachers' understanding of curricular integration. The science–language integration rubric describes the growth of teacher expertise as a continuum from a view of science and language as discreet unrelated domains to the recognition of the superordinate processes that create a synergistic relationship between inquiry science and language development. Examples from teacher interviews are used to illustrate teacher thinking at each level. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 664–687, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 14,874
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
FROM NOVICE TO EXPERT EXCELLENCE AND POWER IN CLINICAL NURSING PRACTICE
Benner, P. (1984) · AJN, American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-198412000-00025 · Cited by 4,706
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer
Dreyfus, H. L., Drey-fus, S. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1987) · IEEE Expert · doi:10.1109/mex.1987.4307079 · Cited by 3,172
(1978) · Cited by 2,948
FROM NOVICE TO EXPERT: EXCELLENCE AND POWER IN CLINICAL NURSING PRACTICE
Benner, P. (1984) · AJN, American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-198412000-00027 · Cited by 2,860
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Massa, M. S. (2018) · The Structure of Theological Revolutions · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190851408.003.0003 · Cited by 1,966
Cited by
Bunch, G. C. (2013) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x12461772 · Cited by 446
Lee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20141 · Cited by 108
Bravo, M. A., Mosqueda, E., Solís, J. L., & Stoddart, T. (2014) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-013-9374-8 · Cited by 52
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09-18
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 664-687
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2020435271
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 24.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.10040
- The paper
- Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.