Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 665

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making

Warren, Beth, Ballenger, Cynthia, Ogonowski, Mark, Rosebery, Ann S., Hudicourt‐Barnes, Josiane·2001·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

There are many ways to understand the gap in science learning and achievement separating low‐income, ethnic minority and linguistic minority children from more economically privileged students. In this article we offer our perspective. First, we discuss in broad strokes how the relationship between everyday and scientific knowledge and ways of knowing has been conceptualized in the field of science education research. We consider two dominant perspectives on this question, one which views the relationship as fundamentally discontinuous and the other which views it as fundamentally continuous. We locate our own work within the latter tradition and propose a framework for understanding the everyday sense‐making practices of students from diverse communities as an intellectual resource in science learning and teaching. Two case studies follow in which we elaborate this point of view through analysis of Haitian American and Latino students' talk and activity as they work to understand metamorphosis and experimentation, respectively. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of this new conceptualization for research on science learning and teaching. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 38: 529–552, 2001

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.1017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science/Project 2061, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy
  2. Bakhtin M, 1981, The dialogic imagination: Four essays
  3. 10.1080/09500789708666715 · DOI
  4. Ballenger C, 2000, Lifting every voice: Pedagogy and the politics of bilingualism, 95
  5. Biagioli M., 1999, The science studies reader
  6. 10.1119/1.12989 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Clement J, 1983, Mental models, 325
  8. 10.1080/0950069890110507 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Conant F., Building bridges: Linking home and school
  10. 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008 · DOI · Paper page
  11. diSessa A., 1991, Inventing graphing: Meta‐representational expertise in children, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117
  12. Eggers–Piérola C. (1996).“We haven't still explored that”: Science learning in a bilingual classroom. Doctoral dissertation Graduate School of Education Harvard University Cambridge MA.
  13. Fox‐Keller E, 1983, A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock
  14. Gee J.P, 1990, Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses
  15. Gee J.P., Challenging a single standard: Multiple perspectives on literacy
  16. Gooding D, 1992, Science as practice and culture, 65
  17. Gooding D., 1989, The uses of experiment: Studies in the natural sciences
  18. 10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Halliday M.A.K., 1993, Writing science: Literary and discursive power
  20. 10.1119/1.19520 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1017/CBO9780511841057 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hudicourt‐Barnes J. (2000).Argumentation in Haitian Creole classrooms. Submitted for publication. (Also presented at the 31st Annual Conference on African Linguistics Boston University March 2–5 2000.)
  23. Hymes D, 1996, Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice
  24. Jacob F, 1995, The statue within
  25. 10.1006/cogp.1993.1003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kuhn D., 1988, The development of scientific thinking skills
  27. 10.1207/s1532690xci0904_1 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Labov W, 1972, Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular
  29. Latour B., 1986, Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts
  30. Lee C.D, 1993, Signifying as a scaffold for literary interpretation: The pedagogical implications of an African American discourse genre
  31. 10.1016/S0898-5898(96)90024-8 · DOI
  32. 10.3102/0013189X027004012 · doi:10.3102/0013189x027004012 · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/tea.3660320804 · DOI
  34. Lehrer R., Advances in instructional psychology
  35. Lemke J, 1995, Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics
  36. Lynch M, 1985, Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory
  37. McCloskey M, 1983, Mental models, 299
  38. 10.1126/science.210.4474.1139 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1119/1.15104 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1017/S0047404500008861 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Michaels S., 2000, Multiliteracies, 267
  42. Minstrell J, 1989, Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research, 131
  43. National Research Council, 1996, National science education standards
  44. 10.1207/s1532690xci1602_1 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Pothier S. (2000 December 1–2).“What is this question asking me to do?” Two cases from literacy and science. Paper presented at the conference Toward the Development of Teacher Research Wellesley MA.
  46. Rheinberger H, 1997, Toward a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube
  47. 10.1353/pbm.1989.0017 · DOI
  48. Rosebery A., 1998, Boats, balloons, and classroom video: Science teaching as inquiry
  49. Rosebery A.S. &Warren B. (1999 November).Supporting teachers to develop theories of children in the particular.. Paper presented at the Conference on Teacher Change National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement University of Wisconsin Madison.
  50. 10.1207/s15327809jls0201_2 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Salk J, 1983, The anatomy of reality
  52. 10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.102 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1159/000418977 · DOI
  54. 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Smitherman G, 1977, Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America
  56. 10.1080/0140528790010209 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Warren B., 1995, New directions for equity in mathematics education, 298
  58. Warren B., 1996, Innovations in learning: New environments for education, 97
  59. Warren B., 1994, Adult biliteracy in the United States, 191
  60. Wolpert L., 1997, Passionate minds: The inner world of scientists, 10.1093/oso/9780198549048.001.0001 · DOI

Cited by

See all 665

Metadata

Authors
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt‐Barnes, J.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-04-30
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
529-552
ISSN
  • 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2736
OpenAlex
W2121742108
Cited by
665
References
1
FWCI
93.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.1017
The paper
Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt‐Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.