The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Professional development in inquiry‐based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups
Abstract
As part of a larger project aimed at promoting science and literacy for culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students, this study has two objectives: (a) to describe teachers' initial beliefs and practices about inquiry‐based science and (b) to examine the impact of the professional development intervention (primarily through instructional units and teacher workshops) on teachers' beliefs and practices related to inquiry‐based science. The research involved 53 third‐ and fourth‐grade teachers at six elementary schools in a large urban school district. At the end of the school year, teachers reported enhanced knowledge of science content and stronger beliefs about the importance of science instruction with diverse student groups, although their actual practices did not change significantly. Based on the results of this first year of implementation as part of a 3‐year longitudinal design, implications for professional development and further research are discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 1021–1043, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004915 · Cited by 5,047
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594
Equity and Science Education Reform
Lynch, S. J. (2000) · doi:10.4324/9781410605139 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2012.667014 · Cited by 375
Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2 · Cited by 342
Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.006 · Cited by 336
Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds
Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20053 · Cited by 332
Self-citationLee, O., Buxton, C., Lewis, S., & LeRoy, K. (2006) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20141 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, O., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1021-1043
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2007859530
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.