Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unpacking students’ epistemic cognition in a physics problem‐solving environment

Lindfors, Maria, Bodin, Madelen, Simon, Shirley·2020·Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Abstract

It is a widely held view that students’ epistemic beliefs influence the way they think and learn in a given context, however, in the science learning context, the relationship between sophisticated epistemic beliefs and success in scientific practice is sometimes ambiguous. Taking this inconsistency as a point of departure, we examined the relationship between students’ scientific epistemic beliefs (SEB), their epistemic practices, and their epistemic cognition in a computer simulation in classical mechanics. Tenth grade students’ manipulations of the simulation, spoken comments, and behavior were screen and video‐recorded and subsequently transcribed and coded. In addition, a stimulated recall interview was undertaken to access students’ thinking and reflections on their practice, in order to understand their practice and make inferences about their process of epistemic cognition. The paper reports on the detailed analysis of the data sets for three students of widely different SEB and performance levels. Comparing the SEB, problem solutions and epistemic practices of the three students has enabled us to examine the interplay between SEB, problem‐solving strategies (PS), conceptual understanding (CU), and metacognitive reflection (MCR), to see how these operate together to facilitate problem solutions. From the analysis, we can better understand how different students’ epistemic cognition is adaptive to the context. The findings have implications for teaching science and further research into epistemic cognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/tea.21606

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1002/sce.10118 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/wics.101 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alexander P. A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 112
  4. 10.1080/00461520.2017.1350181 · DOI
  5. Ash D., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 207
  6. Bakhtin M. M., 1981, The dialogic imagination, 84
  7. 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.006 · DOI
  8. Barzilai S., 2017, On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1
  9. Barzilai S., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 409
  10. 10.1080/00223989809599158 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_5 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/tea.21257 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115 · DOI
  14. Bråten I., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 360
  15. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5 · DOI
  17. Buehl M. M., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 247
  18. 10.4324/9781315617572-3 · doi:10.4324/9781315617572-3
  19. 10.1080/00461520.2011.587722 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Chinn C. A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 460
  21. Chinn C. A., 2014, Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences, 425, 10.7551/mitpress/9737.003.0025 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/tea.21166 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1080/03098265.2010.501541 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.002 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/sce.20460 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.023101 · DOI
  28. 10.1002/sce.1023 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Elby A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 113
  30. Engle R. A., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 239
  31. Erickson F., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 145
  32. 2010, Epistemic climate in elementaryclassrooms. Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, 55
  33. 10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5
  34. Goldman R., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences
  35. 10.1080/00461520802178458 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.4324/9781315795225 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_3 · DOI
  39. Hammer D., 2002, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 169
  40. Hennink M., 2010, Qualitative research methods
  41. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Hofer B. K., 2004, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
  43. 10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1119/1.1763175 · DOI
  45. 10.1163/9789460911453_009 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kelly G. J., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 393
  47. 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.008 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1159/000272885 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1007/978-94-007-1793-0_5 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/sce.20457 · DOI
  52. Knight S., 2016, Collaborative epistemic discourse in classroom information‐seeking tasks, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 1
  53. Lemke J., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 39
  54. 10.1080/09500690903397796 · DOI
  55. 10.1080/00313831.2017.1324907 · DOI
  56. 10.1119/1.1848115 · DOI
  57. 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1017/CBO9780511691904.009 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511691904.009
  59. Mason L., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 375
  60. 10.1119/1.1503377 · DOI
  61. Milbourne J., 2017, The role of content knowledge in ill‐structured problem solving for high school physics students, Research in Science Education, 48, 1
  62. Miles M. B., 2000, Qualitative data analysis
  63. Miller K., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 321
  64. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1080/00220973.2013.813371 · DOI
  67. Muis K. R., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 331
  68. Murphy P. K., 2006, Handbook of educational psychology, 305
  69. 10.1515/9781400828678 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/sce.21106 · DOI
  71. 10.1002/sce.20111 · DOI
  72. 10.1002/sce.20065 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1002/sce.21107 · DOI
  74. Sandoval W. A.(2012 July). Situating epistemological development. The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1 pp. 347–354). Sydney Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
  75. Schoenfeld A. H., 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 334
  76. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498 · Paper page
  77. 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Sinatra G. M., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 479
  79. Sinatra G. M., 2011, Critical theories and models of learning and development relevant to learning and teaching, 257
  80. 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002 · DOI
  82. 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · Paper page
  83. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<654::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  84. Wood P., 2002, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 231
  85. Yerdelen‐Damar S., 2019, Promoting conceptual understanding with explicit epistemic intervention in metacognitive instruction: Interaction between the treatment and epistemic cognition, Research in Science Education, 49, 1
  86. 10.1109/TE.2019.2909491 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lindfors, M., Bodin, M., & Simon, S.
Venue
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-08
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
695-732
ISSN
  • 0022-4308
  • 1098-2736
Cited by
16
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.