The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unpacking students’ epistemic cognition in a physics problem‐solving environment
Abstract
It is a widely held view that students’ epistemic beliefs influence the way they think and learn in a given context, however, in the science learning context, the relationship between sophisticated epistemic beliefs and success in scientific practice is sometimes ambiguous. Taking this inconsistency as a point of departure, we examined the relationship between students’ scientific epistemic beliefs (SEB), their epistemic practices, and their epistemic cognition in a computer simulation in classical mechanics. Tenth grade students’ manipulations of the simulation, spoken comments, and behavior were screen and video‐recorded and subsequently transcribed and coded. In addition, a stimulated recall interview was undertaken to access students’ thinking and reflections on their practice, in order to understand their practice and make inferences about their process of epistemic cognition. The paper reports on the detailed analysis of the data sets for three students of widely different SEB and performance levels. Comparing the SEB, problem solutions and epistemic practices of the three students has enabled us to examine the interplay between SEB, problem‐solving strategies (PS), conceptual understanding (CU), and metacognitive reflection (MCR), to see how these operate together to facilitate problem solutions. From the analysis, we can better understand how different students’ epistemic cognition is adaptive to the context. The findings have implications for teaching science and further research into epistemic cognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Participants' learning records on digital platforms and mobile devices can also be used as stimuli to evoke the memory of their own learning path (Koltovskaia, 2020;Lindfors et al., 2020).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Lindfors et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048
Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes
Jonassen, D. H. (1997) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299613 · Cited by 1,608
Sandoval, W. A., Greene, J. A., & Bråten, I. (2016) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x16669319 · Cited by 143
Edwards, S., Henderson, M., Gronn, D., Scott, A., & Mirkhil, M. (2017) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2016.1152291 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 86
- 10.1002/sce.10118 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/wics.101 · DOI · Paper page
- Alexander P. A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 112
- 10.1080/00461520.2017.1350181 · DOI
- Ash D., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 207
- Bakhtin M. M., 1981, The dialogic imagination, 84
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.03.006 · DOI
- Barzilai S., 2017, On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1
- Barzilai S., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 409
- 10.1080/00223989809599158 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_5 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.21257 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.010115 · DOI
- Bråten I., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 360
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5 · DOI
- Buehl M. M., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 247
- 10.4324/9781315617572-3 · doi:10.4324/9781315617572-3
- 10.1080/00461520.2011.587722 · DOI · Paper page
- Chinn C. A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 460
- Chinn C. A., 2014, Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences, 425, 10.7551/mitpress/9737.003.0025 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.21166 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/03098265.2010.501541 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.20460 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.023101 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.1023 · DOI · Paper page
- Elby A., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 113
- Engle R. A., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 239
- Erickson F., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 145
- 2010, Epistemic climate in elementaryclassrooms. Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice, 55
- 10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5
- Goldman R., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences
- 10.1080/00461520802178458 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9781315795225 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.002 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-02573-5_3 · DOI
- Hammer D., 2002, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 169
- Hennink M., 2010, Qualitative research methods
- 10.1006/ceps.1999.1026 · DOI · Paper page
- Hofer B. K., 2004, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing
- 10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1119/1.1763175 · DOI
- 10.1163/9789460911453_009 · DOI · Paper page
- Kelly G. J., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 393
- 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1159/000272885 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-94-007-1793-0_5 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.20457 · DOI
- Knight S., 2016, Collaborative epistemic discourse in classroom information‐seeking tasks, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26, 1
- Lemke J., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 39
- 10.1080/09500690903397796 · DOI
- 10.1080/00313831.2017.1324907 · DOI
- 10.1119/1.1848115 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511691904.009 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511691904.009
- Mason L., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 375
- 10.1119/1.1503377 · DOI
- Milbourne J., 2017, The role of content knowledge in ill‐structured problem solving for high school physics students, Research in Science Education, 48, 1
- Miles M. B., 2000, Qualitative data analysis
- Miller K., 2007, Video research in the learning sciences, 321
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00220973.2013.813371 · DOI
- Muis K. R., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 331
- Murphy P. K., 2006, Handbook of educational psychology, 305
- 10.1515/9781400828678 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sce.21106 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.20111 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.20065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sce.21107 · DOI
- Sandoval W. A.(2012 July). Situating epistemological development. The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1 pp. 347–354). Sydney Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Schoenfeld A. H., 1992, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 334
- 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498 · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_3 · DOI · Paper page
- Sinatra G. M., 2016, Handbook of epistemic cognition, 479
- Sinatra G. M., 2011, Critical theories and models of learning and development relevant to learning and teaching, 257
- 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<654::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- Wood P., 2002, Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing, 231
- Yerdelen‐Damar S., 2019, Promoting conceptual understanding with explicit epistemic intervention in metacognitive instruction: Interaction between the treatment and epistemic cognition, Research in Science Education, 49, 1
- 10.1109/TE.2019.2909491 · DOI
Cited by
A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Wang, M., Tsai, C.-C., Liang, J.-C., & Spector, J. M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02987-6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindfors, M., Bodin, M., & Simon, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 695-732
- ISSN
- 0022-4308
- 1098-2736
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.