Cited by 1,608Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsProblem and Project Based LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes

Jonassen, David H.·1997·Educational Technology Research and Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02299613

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jonassen, D. H.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jonassen, David H.
Venue
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
1997-03
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
65-94
ISSN
  • 1042-1629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6501
OpenAlex
W1971492392
Cited by
1,608
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 89 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 85
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Technology Research and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
instructional design model, well-structured problems, ill-structured problems, problem solving, learning outcomes, information processing theory, constructivism, situated cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review