The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks
Abstract
The research reported in this study was designed to answer three questions: (a) What misconceptions do eighth grade students have concerning the chemistry concepts from their textbooks. (b) How is reasoning ability related to misconceptions concerning chemistry concepts. (c) How effective are textbooks in teaching an understanding of chemistry concepts? Five chemistry concepts were used in the study: chemical change, dissolution, conservation of atoms, periodicity, and phase change. Problems concerning the five concepts were given to 247 eighth‐grade students in order to assess the students' degree of understanding of chemistry concepts and to identify specific misconceptions. Two pencil‐and‐paper Piaget‐type tasks were used to assess intellectual level. A comparison of intellectual level and scores on the chemistry concepts showed moderate correlations. However, the small number of formal operational students in the sample makes these results inconclusive. A study of the level of understanding of the five chemistry concepts and the nature of the misconceptions held by students indicate a general failure of textbooks to teach a reasonable understanding of chemistry concepts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts
Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660310206 · Cited by 285
Self-citationStern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20019 · Cited by 234
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2011) · Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. · doi:10.1039/c1rp90003j · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-120
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2108158348
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660290203
- The paper
- Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992). Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.