The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts
Abstract
A sample of 100 students from junior high school physical science, high school chemistry, and introductory college chemistry were examined for understanding of five chemistry concepts. The concepts addressed were chemical change, dissolution of a solid in water, conservation of atoms, periodicity, and phase change. The amount of experience with the concepts (grade level) and reasoning ability (developmental level) were examined as possible sources of variation in student understanding. Differences in understanding with respect to grade level were found to be significant for the concepts of chemical change, dissolution of a solid, conservation of atoms, and periodicity. However, few of the students in the college chemistry sample exhibited sound understanding of chemical change, periodicity, or phase change. The use of particulate terms (atoms, ions, molecules) increased across the grade levels. Reasoning ability proved to be a significant factor for student understanding of conservation of atoms and periodicity. An examination of the number and types of misconceptions across the grade levels revealed several interesting patterns and suggested sources for the students' alternative conceptions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958) · Basic Books · doi:10.1037/10034-000 · Cited by 4,596
A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1986) · Studies in Science Education · doi:10.1080/03057268608559933 · Cited by 816
Learning science: A generative process
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730670406 · Cited by 694
The Growth of Logical Thinking
Smith, F. V., Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3118518 · Cited by 597
Grade‐12 students' misconceptions relating to fundamental characteristics of atoms and molecules
Griffiths, A. K., & Preston, K. R. (1992) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660290609 · Cited by 480
Children's conceptions of the changes of state of water
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660200905 · Cited by 397
Is an atom of copper malleable?
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B.-S., & Silberstein, J. (1986) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed063p64 · Cited by 331
Understanding the particulate nature of matter
Gabel, D. L., Samuel, K. V., & Hunn, D. (1987) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed064p695 · Cited by 304
Pupils' understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross‐age study
Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730650209 · Cited by 298
Understandings and misunderstandings of eighth graders of five chemistry concepts found in textbooks
Abraham, M. R., Grzybowski, E. B., Renner, J. W., & Marek, E. A. (1992) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.3660290203 · Cited by 284
Self-citation
Cited by
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2011) · Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. · doi:10.1039/c1rp90003j · Cited by 116
Balım, A. G. (2013) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2013.862907 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-165
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2107507661
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660310206
- The paper
- Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.