The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning
Abstract
Classrooms are complex environments in which curriculum, students, and teachers interact. In recent years a number of studies have investigated the effect of teachers' epistemologies on the classroom environment, yet little is known about students' epistemologies and how these interact with those of teachers. The purpose of this study was to document students' epistemologies and their concurrent views about knowing and learning. Using a written essay, short‐answer responses to statements, a preferred classroom environment inventory, and interviews, students' views on scientific knowledge and their own knowing and learning were collected from 42 students in three sections of an introductory physics course. Our rather broad, qualitative inquiry provides a dynamic view of students' understanding of knowing and learning in high school physics. Our analyses reveal a spectrum of epistemological commitments commensurable with positions from objectivism to relativism, most of them with experientialist coloring. Even within individuals, these commitments could be at once commensurable and incommensurable with the same epistemological position. We also find rather significant inter‐ and intra‐individual differences with respect to the consequences of a specific epistemological stance to learning, the learning strategies employed, and the learning environment preferred. Students' views on knowing and learning in physics are presented in the form of an emergent theory. The findings are discussed in terms of their application to classroom environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Educating the reflective practitioner
Schön, D. A. (1987) · Cited by 11,326
Bruner, J. (1986) · doi:10.4159/9780674029019 · Cited by 8,657
(2014) · The SAGE Encyclopedia of Action Research · doi:10.4135/9781446294406.n148 · Cited by 7,250
Actual Minds, Possible Worlds.
Mergler, N., Schleifer, R., & Bruner, J. (1986) · MLN · doi:10.2307/2905728 · Cited by 6,609
Neufeld, A., & Ryan, A. G. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation · doi:10.3138/cjpe.3.006 · Cited by 5,913
Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0612 · Cited by 5,464
Cited by
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543067001088 · Cited by 3,181
Pea, R. D. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6 · Cited by 1,047
Tien, L. T., Roth, V., & Kampmeier, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.10038 · Cited by 321
Introductory thermal concept evaluation: assessing students' understanding
Yeo, S., & Zadnik, M. (2001) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/1.1424603 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-30
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2161896195
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 34.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660310104
- The paper
- Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students' epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.