The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students
Abstract
Modern chemistry concepts have the particulate nature of matter at their core. Chemists explain most phenomena in terms of atomic and molecular models. The lack of understanding of chemistry concepts may be linked to the students' inability to build complete mental models that visualize particulate behavior. With computer animation technology, dynamic and three‐dimensional presentations are possible. This study explores the effect of computer animations depicting the particulate nature of matter on college students' mental models of the chemical phenomena. A Particulate Nature of Matter Evaluation Test (PNMET) instrument was used to determine the nature of the students' visualizations and, therefore, their comprehension of the chemical concept studied. Animations were used in two treatment situations: (a) as a supplement in large‐group lectures, and (b) as both the lecture supplement and an assigned individual activity in a computer laboratory. These two experimental treatments were compared to a control group. Both treatment groups received significantly higher conceptual understanding scores on the PNMET than did the control group. This increased understanding may be due to the superiority of the formation of more expertlike, dynamic mental models of particle behavior in these chemical processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Student Perceptions Using Augmented Reality and 3D Visualization Technologies in Chemistry Education
Abdinejad, M., Talaie, B., Qorbani, H. S., & Dalili, S. (2021) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09880-2 · Cited by 160
The Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of the Science Textbooks
Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013) · Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_1 · Cited by 71
Adadan, E. (2013) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-012-9299-9 · Cited by 62
Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2012) · Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.26529/cepsj.398 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Science Teaching
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 521-534
- ISSN
- 0022-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2736
- OpenAlex
- W2161395717
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/tea.3660320508
- The paper
- Williamson, V. M., & Abraham, M. R. (1995). The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.