The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Role and Potential Dangers of Visualisation when Learning about Sub-Microscopic Explanations in Chemistry Education
Open accessAbstract
The core of theory-driven chemistry education consists of the constant shift between the different representational domains of chemical thinking: the macroscopic, the sub-microscopic, and the symbolic domains. Because the sub-microscopic domain can neither be seen nor directly visualised, it requires specific forms of visualisation, i.e. pictures and animations illustrating the model-based level of discrete particles, atoms, or molecular structures. This paper considers the central role visualisations play when learning about the model-based, sub-microscopic level, but it also reflects the dangers inherent in employing insufficiently examined, poorly considered, or even misleading visualisations. This is outlined using different examples taken from both textbooks for lower secondary chemistry education (for students aged 10 to 15) and from the internet. Implications for structuring and using sub-micro visualisations in chemistry education are also given.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The graphic in Figure8 image C is a problematic construct because it depicts zinc and copper electrodes as composed of atoms that change in a chemically incorrect way.
“It must, however, be said that the graphic is a problematic construct. Neither the zinc nor the copper electrode is composed of atoms and, thus, cannot change in the fashion in which this figure presents them (Eilks et al., 2012).”
From An analysis of the visual representation of redox reactions and related content in Brazilian secondary school chemistry textbooks (2020) · cites this paper as Eilks et al., 2012
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Bremen (DE)
- University of Hildesheim (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Eilks, Ingo
- Venue
- Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal
- Publisher
- University of Ljubljana
- Published
- 2012-03-31
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-145
- ISSN
- 1855-9719 (ISSN-L)
- 2232-2647
- OpenAlex
- W2992618227
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Chemistry Education and Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Various Chemistry Research Topics
- Keywords
- visualization, chemistry education, chemical representation, particle model, textbook illustrations, misconceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review