The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: 3D Printed TCP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
Open accessAbstract
This study reports the manufacturing process of 3D interconnected macroporous tricalcium phosphate (TCP) scaffolds with controlled internal architecture by direct 3D printing (3DP), and high mechanical strength obtained by microwave sintering. TCP scaffolds with 27%, 35% and 41% designed macroporosity with pore sizes of 500 μm, 750 μm and 1000 μm, respectively, were manufactured by direct 3DP. These scaffolds were then sintered at 1150 °C and 1250 °C in conventional electric muffle and microwave furnaces, respectively. Total open porosity between 42% and 63% was obtained in the sintered scaffolds due to the presence of intrinsic micropores along with designed pores. A significant increase in compressive strength between 46% and 69% was achieved by microwave compared to conventional sintering as a result of efficient densification. Maximum compressive strengths of 10.95 ± 1.28 MPa and 6.62 ± 0.67 MPa were achieved for scaffolds with 500 μm designed pores (~ 400 μm after sintering) sintered in microwave and conventional furnaces, respectively. An increase in cell density with a decrease in macropore size was observed during in vitro cell-material interactions using human osteoblast cells. Histomorphological analysis revealed that the presence of both micro- and macropores facilitated osteoid-like new bone formation when tested in femoral defects of Sprague-Dawley rats. Our results show that bioresorbable 3D-printed TCP scaffolds have great potential in tissue engineering applications for bone tissue repair and regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage
Hutmacher, D. W. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6 · Cited by 4,994
Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering
Hollister, S. J. (2005) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1421 · Cited by 3,969
Department of Materials, U. O. O., Sachlos, E., & Czernuszka, J. (2003) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v005a03 · Cited by 1,303
Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses
Hulbert, S. F., Young, F. A., Mathews, R. S., Klawitter, J. J., Talbert, C. D., & Stelling, F. H. (1970) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820040309 · Cited by 1,019
Three-Dimensional Printing: Rapid Tooling and Prototypes Directly from a CAD Model
Sachs, E., Cima, M., & Cornie, J. (1990) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61035-x · Cited by 871
The Design of Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering. Part II. Rapid Prototyping Techniques
Yang, S., Leong, K.-F., Du, Z., & Chua, C.-K. (2002) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632702753503009 · Cited by 729
Taboas, J. M., Maddox, R. D., Krebsbach, P. H., & Hollister, S. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00276-4 · Cited by 691
Dorozhkin, S. V. (2007) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-006-1467-8 · Cited by 573
α-Tricalcium phosphate: Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications
Carrodeguas, R. G., & De Aza, S. (2011) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.019 · Cited by 534
Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Liu, C., Xia, Z., & Czernuszka, J. T. (2007) · Chemical Engineering Research and Design · doi:10.1205/cherd06196 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials
Chia, H. N., & Wu, B. M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Engineering · doi:10.1186/s13036-015-0001-4 · Cited by 1,734
Progress in 3D bioprinting technology for tissue/organ regenerative engineering
Matai, I., Kaur, G., Seyedsalehi, A., McClinton, A., & Laurencin, C. T. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119536 · Cited by 1,156
3D Printing of Scaffolds for Tissue Regeneration Applications
Do, A., Khorsand, B., Geary, S. M., & Salem, A. K. (2015) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201500168 · Cited by 949
Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing
Guvendiren, M., Molde, J., Soares, R. M. D., & Kohn, J. (2016) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00121 · Cited by 732
Additive manufacturing of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: Processing and prospects
Balla, V. K., Kate, K. H., Satyavolu, J., Singh, P., & Tadimeti, J. G. D. (2019) · Composites Part B: Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.106956 · Cited by 580
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarafder, S., Balla, V. K., Davies, N. M., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Bose, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-03-07
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 631-641
- ISSN
- 1932-6254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1564257292
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: 3D Printed TCP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/term.555
- The paper
- Tarafder, S., Balla, V. K., Davies, N. M., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Bose, S. (2013). Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: 3D Printed TCP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.555
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.