The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E‐business model design, classification, and measurements
Abstract
“Business model” is one of the latest buzzwords in the Internet and electronic business world. This article has the ambition to give this term a more rigorous content. The objective is threefold. The first objective is to propose a theoretical e‐business model framework for doing business in the Internet era. The second is to propose a multidimensional classification‐scheme for e‐Business Models, as opposed to the actual tendency in academic literature to use two‐dimensional classifications. The final objective is to define critical success factors, based on a field study in order to find out and compare the performance indicators used by e‐business firms that are competing with similar business models. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
Cited by
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
The business model ontology a proposition in a design science approach
Osterwalder, A. (2004) · Unknown · doi:10.22005/bcu.15985 · Cited by 1,932
Self-citationDeveloping a unified framework of the business model concept
Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D. (2010) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.21 · Cited by 879
Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation
Martins, L. L., Rindova, V. P., & Greenbaum, B. E. (2015) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1191 · Cited by 581
Metadata
- Authors
- Dubosson‐Torbay, M., Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y.
- Venue
- Thunderbird International Business Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-28
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-23
- ISSN
- 1096-4762 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6874
- OpenAlex
- W1983237665
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
