Cited by 879Business Strategies and InnovationInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInnovation and Knowledge Management

Developing a unified framework of the business model concept

Al-Debei, Mutaz M, Avison, David·2010·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Recent rapid advances in Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) have highlighted the rising importance of the Business Model (BM) concept in the field of Information Systems (IS). Despite agreement on its importance to an organization's success, the concept is still fuzzy and vague, and there is little consensus regarding its compositional facets. Identifying the fundamental concepts, modeling principles, practical functions, and reach of the BM relevant to IS and other business concepts is by no means complete. This paper, following a comprehensive review of the literature, principally employs the content analysis method and utilizes a deductive reasoning approach to provide a hierarchical taxonomy of the BM concepts from which to develop a more comprehensive framework. This framework comprises four fundamental aspects. First, it identifies four primary BM dimensions along with their constituent elements forming a complete ontological structure of the concept. Second, it cohesively organizes the BM modeling principles, that is, guidelines and features. Third, it explains the reach of the concept showing its interactions and intersections with strategy, business processes, and IS so as to place the BM within the world of digital business. Finally, the framework explores three major functions of BMs within digital organizations to shed light on the practical significance of the concept. Hence, this paper links the BM facets in a novel manner offering an intact definition. In doing so, this paper provides a unified conceptual framework for the BM concept that we argue is comprehensive and appropriate to the complex nature of businesses today. This leads to fruitful implications for theory and practice and also enables us to suggest a research agenda using our conceptual framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2010.21

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Debei, M. M., & Avison, D.
Affiliations
  • Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University Uxbridge U.K.
  • École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2010-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
359-376
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W2152604313
Cited by
879
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 32
FWCI
79.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
business models, business model concept, conceptual framework, business model dimensions, business model ontology, business strategy, business processes, e-commerce, digital organization, information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review