Cited by 29Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Effect of masupirdine (SUVN‐502) on cognition in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double‐blind, phase 2, proof‐of‐concept study

Open access
Nirogi, Ramakrishna, Ieni, John, Goyal, Vinod Kumar, Ravula, Jyothsna, Jetta, Satish, Shinde, Anil, Jayarajan, Pradeep, Benade, Vijay +5 more·2022·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored the efficacy and safety of a serotonin‐6 receptor antagonist, masupirdine, as adjunct treatment in patients with moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) concomitantly treated with donepezil and memantine. Methods: The effects of masupirdine were evaluated in patients with moderate AD dementia on background treatment with donepezil and memantine. Five hundred thirty‐seven patients were expected to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio, using permuted blocked randomization. After a 2‐ to 4‐week screening period, the study consisted of a 26‐week double‐blind treatment period, and a 4‐week washout period. The primary efficacy measure was the 11‐item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS‐Cog 11). Secondary efficacy measures were Clinical Dementia Rating Scale–Sum of Boxes, Mini‐Mental State Examination, 23‐item Alzheimer's Disease Co‐operative Study Activities of Daily Living, and 12‐item Neuropsychiatric Inventory. Changes from baseline were analyzed using a mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). A total of 564 patients were randomized to receive either daily masupirdine 50 mg (190 patients), masupirdine 100 mg (185 patients), or placebo (189 patients). The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02580305). Results: The MMRM results showed statistically non‐significant treatment differences in change from baseline in ADAS‐Cog 11 scores at week 26, comparing each masupirdine dose arm to the placebo arm. No significant treatment effects were observed in the secondary evaluations. Discussion: Masupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated. Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed. Highlights: Masupirdine was evaluated in moderate Alzheimer's disease patients. First trial in class with background treatment of donepezil and memantine. Masupirdine was generally safe and well tolerated. Possible reasons for the observed trial results are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/trc2.12307

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding masupirdine (SUVN-502) as adjuvant to donepezil and memantine demonstrated no additional palliative benefits in a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02580305).

    “However, adding the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist, masupirdine (SUVN-502), as adjuvant to donepezil and memantine, demonstrated no additional palliative benefits in a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02580305) [58, 59].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Weintraub D. Impact of SYN120 (a Dual 5‐HT6/5‐HT2A antagonist) on psychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease dementia: results from a Phase 2a Study. Movement disorders, 2018, 33, S105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nirogi, R., Ieni, J., Goyal, V. K., Ravula, J., Jetta, S., Shinde, A., Jayarajan, P., Benade, V., Palacharla, V. R. C., Dogiparti, D. K., Jasti, V., Atri, A., & Cummings, J.
Affiliations
  • Suven Life Sciences (India) (IN)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Cummings, Jeffrey
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e12307-e12307
ISSN
2352-8737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285179674
Cited by
29
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG053798, P20AG068053, P30AG072980, R35AG071476)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM109025)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS093334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, moderate dementia, adjunctive therapy, donepezil, memantine, cognitive function, drug safety and tolerability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review