Cited by 230Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Long-term course and effectiveness of combination therapy in Alzheimer disease

Open access
Atri, Alireza, Shaughnessy, Lynn W., Locascio, Joseph J., Growdon, John H.·2008·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the real-world clinical effectiveness and long-term clinical trajectory in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) treated with combination (COMBO) therapy consisting of cholinesterase-inhibitor (CI) plus memantine (MEM) versus CI alone versus no treatment with either. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-two subjects with probable AD underwent serial clinical evaluations at a memory disorders unit. Cognition was assessed by the Information-Memory-Concentration subscale of the Blessed Dementia Scale (BDS) and function was assessed by the Weintraub Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL) at 6-month intervals. One hundred forty-four subjects received standard care without CI or MEM (NO-RX), 122 received CI monotherapy, and 116 received COMBO therapy with CI plus MEM. Mean follow-up was 30 months (4.1 visits) and mean cumulative medication treatment time was 22.5 months. Rates of decline were analyzed using mixed-effects regression models, and Cohen's d effect sizes were calculated annually for years 1 to 4. RESULTS: Covarying for baseline scores, age, education, and duration of illness, the COMBO group had significantly lower mean annualized rates of deterioration in BDS and ADL scores compared with the CI (P<0.001; Cohen's dBDS=0.10-0.34 and dADL=0.23-0.46 at 1 to 2 y) and NO-RX groups (P<0.001; Cohen's dBDS=0.56-0.73 and dADL=0.32-0.48 at 1 to 2 y). For the COMBO group, Cohen's d effect sizes increased with treatment duration. Similar comparisons significantly favored the CI over the NO-RX group on the BDS. CONCLUSIONS: COMBO therapy slows cognitive and functional decline in AD compared with CI monotherapy and no treatment. These benefits had small-to-medium effect sizes that increased with time on treatment and were sustained for years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wad.0b013e31816653bc

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer-term prospective observational clinical patient cohort studies report reduced clinical decline in patients with AD treated at any stage.

    “Longer-term prospective observational clinical patient cohort studies report reduced clinical decline in patients with AD treated at any stage.[114][115][116][117][118][119]”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [114]

  • Short-term randomized controlled trials, longer-term open-label extensions, and long-term observational prospective clinical cohort effectiveness studies support the safety and benefits of anti-AD treatments in combination, most frequently as memantine added on to a stable regimen of background cholinesterase inhibitor treatment.

    “Short-term (6-12 months) RCTs (level I evidence), longer-term (12-36 months) openlabel extensions of RCTs (level II or III evidence), and long-term (2 to 5-plus years) observational prospective clinical cohort effectiveness studies (level II evidence) support the safety and benefits of anti-AD treatments in combination, most frequently as memantine added on to a stable regimen of background ChEI”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [114]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atri, A., Shaughnessy, L. W., Locascio, J. J., & Growdon, J. H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Atri, Alireza
  • Shaughnessy, Lynn W.
  • Locascio, Joseph J.
  • Growdon, John H.
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2008-07
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
209-221
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133239607
Cited by
230
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 33
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institute on Aging (5P50AG05134, 1K23 AG27171-01, K23AG027171, P50AG005134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, combination therapy, cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, cognitive decline, functional decline, activities of daily living, long-term treatment effectiveness, real-world clinical outcomes, treatment duration
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cholinesterase Inhibitors, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Memantine, Time, Dopamine Agents, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review