Cited by 14Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Differences and similarities between familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia: an Italian single-center cohort study

Open access
Benussi, Alberto, Libri, Ilenia, Premi, Enrico, Alberici, Antonella, Cantoni, Valentina, Gadola, Yasmine, Rivolta, Jasmine, Pengo, Marta +8 more·2022·Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions

Abstract

Introduction: The possibility to generalize our understandings on treatments and assessments to both familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) and sporadic FTD (s‐FTD) is a fundamental perspective for the near future, considering the constant advancement in potential disease‐modifying therapies that target particular genetic forms of FTD. We aimed to investigate differences in clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and blood‐based biomarkers between f‐FTD and s‐FTD. Methods: In this longitudinal cohort study, we evaluated a consecutive sample of symptomatic FTD patients, classified as f‐FTD and s‐FTD according to Goldman scores (GS). All patients underwent clinical, behavioral, and neuropsychiatric symptom assessment, CSF biomarkers and serum neurofilament light (NfL) analysis, and brain atrophy evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Of 570 patients with FTD, 123 were classified as f‐FTD, and 447 as s‐FTD. In the f‐FTD group, 95 had a pathogenic FTD mutation while 28 were classified as GS = 1 or 2; of the s‐FTD group, 133 were classified as GS = 3 and 314 with GS = 4. f‐FTD and s‐FTD cases showed comparable demographic features, except for younger age at disease onset, age at diagnosis, and higher years of education in the f‐FTD group (all P < .05). f‐FTD showed worse behavioral disturbances as measured with Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) negative behaviors (14.0 ± 7.6 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4, P = .002), and positive behaviors (20.0 ± 11.0 vs. 17.4 ± 11.8, P = .031). Serum NfL concentrations were higher in patients with f‐FTD (70.9 ± 37.9 pg/mL) compared to s‐FTD patients (37.3 ± 24.2 pg/mL, P < .001), and f‐FTD showed greater brain atrophy in the frontal and temporal regions and basal ganglia. Patients with f‐FTD had significantly shorter survival than those with s‐FTD ( P = .004). Discussion: f‐FTD and s‐FTD are very similar clinical entities, but with different biological mechanisms, and different rates of progression. The parallel characterization of both f‐FTD and s‐FTD will improve our understanding of the disease, and aid in designing future clinical trials for both genetic and sporadic forms of FTD. Highlights: Do clinical features and biomarkers differ between patients with familial frontotemporal dementia (f‐FTD) and sporadic FTD (s‐FTD)? In this cohort study of 570 patients with FTD, f‐FTD and s‐FTD share similar demographic features, but with younger age at disease onset and diagnosis in the f‐FTD group. f‐FTD showed higher serum neurofilament light concentrations, greater brain damage, and shorter survival, compared to s‐FTD. f‐FTD and s‐FTD are very similar clinical entities, but with different cognitive reserve mechanisms and different rates of progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/trc2.12326

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [43]Benussi A, Karikari TK, Ashton N, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum NfL and p‐Tau 181 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020; 91(9): 960‐ 967. 10.1136/jnnp-2020-323487 32611664 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benussi, A., Libri, I., Premi, E., Alberici, A., Cantoni, V., Gadola, Y., Rivolta, J., Pengo, M., Gazzina, S., Calhoun, V. D., Gasparotti, R., Zetterberg, H., Ashton, N. J., Blennow, K., Padovani, A., & Borroni, B.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Borroni, Barbara
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e12326-e12326
ISSN
2352-8737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287313258
Cited by
14
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2016615, 2112455)
  • Alzheimer's Association (ADSF-21-831377-C, 21-831376 -C, ADSF‐21‐831376‐C, #ADSF-21-831381-C, JPND2019-466-236, -21-831381-C, -21- 831377-C)
  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation (2016862, FO2017-0243, 201809, ADSF-21-831381-C, 2017-00915, #ALFGBG-715986, 201809–2016862, ADSF-21-831377-C, 860197, JPND2019-466-236, JPND2021-00694, 201809-2016615, #ADSF-21-831376-C, #RDAPB‐201809‐2016615, AF-742881)
  • Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse (#FO2017-0243, FO2019-0228, 860197)
  • Stiftelsen för Gamla Tjänarinnor (860197, FO2019‐0228)
  • European Commission (JPND2021‐00694, JPND2019‐466‐236, 860197)
  • Fondazione Cariplo (2021-1516)
  • Ministero della Salute (2018-, RF-2018-12366665, RF-2018)
  • Hjärnfonden (FO2017‑0243, FO2017, ALFGBG-715986, FO2019‐0228, JPND2019-466-236)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (860197, 2017-00915, (#ALFGBG-715986, 681712, 2018-, JPND2019-466-236, FO2017-0243, 2018-02532, JPND2021-00694)
  • UK Dementia Research Institute (#2017-00915, ALFGBG-715986, RDAPB-201809-2016615, FO2017-0243, -201809-2016615)
  • Associazione Italiana Ricerca Alzheimer (Airalzh-AGYR2020, AGYR2020)
  • National Institutes of Health (2112455, 2018-02532)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG068398, RF1AG063153)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
familial frontotemporal dementia, sporadic frontotemporal dementia, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, serum neurofilament light, brain atrophy, behavioral problems, survival, disease-modifying therapy, Frontal Systems Behavior Scale, age of onset, Italian patients, disease progression prediction, neuropsychiatric symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review