Cited by 309Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Time to diagnosis in young-onset dementia as compared with late-onset dementia

van Vliet, D., de Vugt, M. E., Bakker, C., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J. F. J., Koopmans, R. T. C. M., Verhey, F. R. J.·2013·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background The extent to which specific factors influence diagnostic delays in dementia is unclear. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare duration from symptom onset to diagnosis for young-onset dementia (YOD) and late-onset dementia (LOD) and to assess the effect of age at onset, type of dementia, gender, living situation, education and family history of dementia on this duration. Method Data on 235 YOD and 167 LOD patients collected from caregivers from two prospective cohort studies were used. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Results The duration between symptom onset and the diagnosis of YOD exceeded that of LOD by an average of 1.6 years (2.8 v. 4.4 years). Young age and being diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia were related to increases in the time to diagnosis. Subjects with vascular dementia experienced shorter time to diagnosis. Conclusions There is a need to raise special awareness of YOD to facilitate a timely diagnosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712001122

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Vliet, D., de Vugt, M. E., Bakker, C., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J. F. J., Koopmans, R. T. C. M., & Verhey, F. R. J.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-05-28
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
423-432
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2007389916
Cited by
309
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
early-onset dementia, late-onset dementia, time to diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, frontotemporal dementia, vascular dementia, age of onset, family history of dementia, living situation, gender differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Attitude to Health, Dementia, Family Health, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Severity of Illness Index, Caregivers, Age of Onset, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Delayed Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review