Contingent screening for preterm pre-eclampsia
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Effective screening for pre-eclampsia resulting in delivery < 37 weeks' gestation (preterm PE) is provided by assessment of a combination of maternal factors, mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF) at 11-13 or 19-24 weeks' gestation. This study explores the possibility of carrying out routine screening for preterm PE by maternal factors and MAP in all pregnancies and reserving measurements of UtA-PI and PlGF for a subgroup of the population, selected on the basis of the risk derived from screening by maternal factors and MAP alone. METHODS: Study data were derived from prospective screening for adverse obstetric outcomes in women attending their routine hospital visit at 11-13 and/or 19-24 weeks' gestation. Bayes' theorem was used to derive the a-priori risk for preterm PE from maternal factors and MAP. The posterior risk was obtained by the addition of UtA-PI and PlGF. We estimated the detection rate (DR) of preterm PE, at an overall false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%, from a policy in which first-stage screening by a combination of maternal factors and MAP defines screen-positive, screen-negative and intermediate-risk groups, with the latter undergoing second-stage screening by UtA-PI and PlGF. RESULTS: At 11-13 weeks' gestation, the model-based DR of preterm PE, at a 10% FPR, when screening the whole population by maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF was 74%. A similar DR was achieved by two-stage screening, with screening by maternal factors and MAP in the first stage and reserving measurement of UtA-PI and PlGF for the second stage and for only 50% of the population. If second-stage screening was offered to 30% of the population, there would be only a small reduction in DR from 74% to 71%. At 19-24 weeks, the model-based DR of preterm PE, at a 10% FPR, when screening the whole population by maternal factors, MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF was 84%. A similar DR was achieved by two-stage screening with measurements of UtA-PI and PlGF in only 70% of the population; if second-stage screening was offered to 40% of the population, the DR would be reduced from 84% to 81%. CONCLUSIONS: High DR of preterm PE can be achieved by two-stage screening in the first and second trimesters with maternal factors and MAP in the whole population and measurements of UtA-PI and PlGF in only some of the pregnancies. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A two-step screening protocol led to a small decrease in detection rate of preterm preeclampsia, from 74% to 71%.
“This is based on a study that showed that a two-step screening protocol led to a small decrease in detection rate of preterm preeclampsia, from 74% to 71% [76].”
From First-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines (2026) · cites this paper as [76]
Cites
O’Gorman, N., Wright, D., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., Wright, A., Poon, L. C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2016) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.034 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Self-citationUterine artery Doppler at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia
Plasencia, W., Maiz, N., Bonino, S., Kaihura, C., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.5157 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Screening for pre-eclampsia by maternal factors and biomarkers at 11–13 weeks’ gestation
Tan, M. Y., Syngelaki, A., Poon, L. C., Rolnik, D. L., O'Gorman, N., Delgado, J. L., Akolekar, R., Konstantinidou, L., Tsavdaridou, M., Galeva, S., et al. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19112 · Cited by 438 · see citing works
Self-citationImpact of new definitions of pre‐eclampsia on incidence and performance of first‐trimester screening
Khan, N., Andrade, W., De Castro, H., Wright, A., Wright, D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2020) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.21867 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationFirst-Trimester Ultrasound: A Comparative Review of Guidelines
Boureka, E., Tsakiridis, I., Michos, G., Liberis, A., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., & Dagklis, T. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16111695
- Authors
- Wright, D., Gallo, D. M., Gil Pugliese, S., Casanova, C., & Nicolaides, K. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
- Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine; King's College Hospital; London UK
- Corresponding author
- Nicolaides, K. H.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 554-559
- ISSN
- 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1910789778
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fetal Medicine Foundation (1 037 116, Charity No: 1037116)
- Universidad de Granada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- preterm preeclampsia, preeclampsia screening, two-stage screening, uterine artery pulsatility index, placental growth factor, mean arterial pressure, maternal risk factors, detection rate, false positive rate, Bayes' theorem, early pregnancy screening, second-trimester screening, third-trimester screening, adverse obstetric outcomes, cost-effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Placenta Growth Factor, Bayes Theorem, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prospective Studies, Uterine Artery, Arterial Pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review