Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited

Open access
Baschat, A. A., Gembruch, U.·2003·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the distribution of Doppler pulsatility index (PI) measurements of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries in singleton fetuses of women with normal uterine artery blood flow and to construct reference ranges for the cerebroplacental PI Doppler ratio. Methods: The PI was determined in the mid‐portion of the umbilical artery and the mid‐ or distal segment of the middle cerebral artery in 306 normal singleton fetuses. The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio (CPR) was determined from paired measurements. After determination of the best fit, reference ranges were constructed for each parameter against gestational age (GA). Results: The PI for the umbilical artery had a linear relationship with GA (umbilical artery PI = − 0.0246 × GA + 1.7791, r2 = 0.4025, P < 0.001). The middle cerebral artery PI and the CPR both showed a quadratic relationship with GA (middle cerebral artery PI = − 0.0058 × GA 2 + 0.3335 × GA − 2.7317, r2 = 0.2365, P < 0.01), (CPR = − 0.0059 × GA 2 + 0.383 × GA − 4.0636, r2 = 0.2788, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The CPR is not constant throughout gestation. Reference ranges constructed by a standardized Doppler technique may be of benefit in the monitoring of high‐risk pregnancies. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.20

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03285.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07932.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/00006250-199203000-00018 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08299.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/0301-5629(95)00025-M · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70283-8 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gosling RG, 1975, Arteries and Veins, 61
  8. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00329.x · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00329.x
  9. 10.7863/jum.1989.8.4.187 · doi:10.7863/jum.1989.8.4.187
  10. Devine PA, 1994, Middle cerebral to umbilical artery Doppler ratio in post‐date pregnancies, Obstet Gynecol, 84, 856
  11. 10.1515/jpme.1990.18.3.165 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020112.x · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00634.x · doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00634.x
  14. 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00661.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0378-3782(96)01777-X · DOI

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Baschat, A. A., & Gembruch, U.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-13
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
124-127
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1996922083
Cited by
504
References
0
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.20
The paper
Baschat, A. A., & Gembruch, U. (2003). The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.