Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 347

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction

Open access
Bahado-Singh, Ray O., Kovanci, Ertug, Jeffres, Andrea, Oz, Utku, Deren, Ozgur, Copel, Joshua, Mari, Giancarlo·1999·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether the Doppler cerebroplacental ratio predicts perinatal outcome in fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN: The middle cerebral and umbilical artery pulsatility index values were measured in 203 fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction, of which 123 were delivered <3 weeks after the last Doppler examination. Perinatal outcome was categorized as (1) birth weight <10th percentile, (2) birth weight <5th percentile, (3) perinatal complications (meconium-stained fluid, cesarean section for fetal distress, 5-minute Apgar score <7, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit stay >24 hours, hypoglycemia, or polycythemia), (4) birth weight <10th percentile plus complications, and (5) birth weight <5th percentile plus complications. The cerebroplacental ratio (middle cerebral artery pulsatility index divided by umbilical artery pul-satility index) values were expressed as multiples of the normal median. Receiver-operator characteristic curves (sensitivity vs false-positive rates) were plotted for the prediction of each category of perinatal outcome and the areas under the curves were determined. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to determine whether the cerebroplacental ratio improved outcome prediction over umbilical artery Doppler imaging alone. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in perinatal morbidity and mortality in cases with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio. The areas under the receiver-operator curves characteristics for the prediction of perinatal outcome with use of the cerebroplacental ratio were statistically very significant. For birth weight <10th percentile we noted P <.001, with P <.0001 for each of the other 4 outcome categories. As shown by regression analyses, the cerebroplacental ratio appeared to improve the prediction of perinatal outcome compared with umbilical artery velocimetry alone. An interesting finding was that the cerebroplacental ratio did not appear to correlate significantly with outcome in fetuses at >34 weeks. CONCLUSION: Doppler identification of the fetal "brain-sparing" effect strongly predicts outcome in fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction. The brain-sparing effect predicted perinatal problems only in fetuses <34 weeks' gestation at the Doppler examination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70283-8

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Bahado-Singh, R. O., Kovanci, E., Jeffres, A., Oz, U., Deren, O., Copel, J., & Mari, G.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-03
Volume
180
Issue
3
Pages
750-756
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984024614
Cited by
347
References
19
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70283-8
The paper
Bahado-Singh, R. O., Kovanci, E., Jeffres, A., Oz, U., Deren, O., Copel, J., & Mari, G. (1999). The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70283-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.