The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether the Doppler cerebroplacental ratio predicts perinatal outcome in fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN: The middle cerebral and umbilical artery pulsatility index values were measured in 203 fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction, of which 123 were delivered <3 weeks after the last Doppler examination. Perinatal outcome was categorized as (1) birth weight <10th percentile, (2) birth weight <5th percentile, (3) perinatal complications (meconium-stained fluid, cesarean section for fetal distress, 5-minute Apgar score <7, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit stay >24 hours, hypoglycemia, or polycythemia), (4) birth weight <10th percentile plus complications, and (5) birth weight <5th percentile plus complications. The cerebroplacental ratio (middle cerebral artery pulsatility index divided by umbilical artery pul-satility index) values were expressed as multiples of the normal median. Receiver-operator characteristic curves (sensitivity vs false-positive rates) were plotted for the prediction of each category of perinatal outcome and the areas under the curves were determined. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were used to determine whether the cerebroplacental ratio improved outcome prediction over umbilical artery Doppler imaging alone. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in perinatal morbidity and mortality in cases with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio. The areas under the receiver-operator curves characteristics for the prediction of perinatal outcome with use of the cerebroplacental ratio were statistically very significant. For birth weight <10th percentile we noted P <.001, with P <.0001 for each of the other 4 outcome categories. As shown by regression analyses, the cerebroplacental ratio appeared to improve the prediction of perinatal outcome compared with umbilical artery velocimetry alone. An interesting finding was that the cerebroplacental ratio did not appear to correlate significantly with outcome in fetuses at >34 weeks. CONCLUSION: Doppler identification of the fetal "brain-sparing" effect strongly predicts outcome in fetuses at risk for intrauterine growth restriction. The brain-sparing effect predicted perinatal problems only in fetuses <34 weeks' gestation at the Doppler examination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine
Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561 · Cited by 6,569
Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: pathological correlation
GILES, W. B., TRUDINGER, B. J., & BAIRD, P. J. (1985) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01045.x · Cited by 724
Blood flow to fetal organs as a function of arterial oxygen content
Peeters, L. L. H., Sheldon, R. E., Jones, M. D., Makowski, E. L., & Meschia, G. (1979) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(16)32989-1 · Cited by 507
Cerebral-Umbilical Doppler Ratio As a Predictor of Adverse Perinatal Outcome
GRAMELLINI, D., FOLLI, M. C., RABONI, S., VADORA, E., & MERIALDI, A. (1992) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-199203000-00018 · Cited by 481
Doppler ultrasonography in high-risk pregnancies: Systematic review with meta-analysis
Alfirevic, Z., & Neilson, J. P. (1995) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(95)90466-2 · Cited by 415
Wladimiroff, J. W., van den Wijngaard, J. A. G. W., Degani, S., Noordam, M. J., van Eyck, J., & Tonge, H. M. (1987) · PubMed · Cited by 348
Impact of Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Body Proportionality on Fetal and Neonatal Outcome
Kramer, M. S., Olivier, M., McLean, F. H., Willis, D. M., & Usher, R. H. (1990) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.86.5.707 · Cited by 323
Constructing time‐specific reference ranges
Royston, P. (1991) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780100502 · Cited by 310
The significance of absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery velocity waveforms
Rochelson, B., Schulman, H., Farmakides, G., Bracero, L., Ducey, J., Fleischer, A., Penny, B., & Winter, D. (1987) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(87)90147-5 · Cited by 196
Arbeille, P., Maulik, D., Fignon, A., Stale, H., Berson, M., Bodard, S., & Locatelli, A. (1995) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/0301-5629(95)00025-m · Cited by 147
Cited by
Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management
Figueras, F., & Gardosi, J. (2011) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.055 · Cited by 485
Fetal Growth Restriction: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 227
(2021) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004251 · Cited by 435
Diagnosis and surveillance of late-onset fetal growth restriction
Figueras, F., Caradeux, J., Crispi, F., Eixarch, E., Peguero, A., & Gratacos, E. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.003 · Cited by 300
Baschat, A. A. (2011) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.9008 · Cited by 299
Ebbing, C., Rasmussen, S., & Kiserud, T. (2007) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.4088 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahado-Singh, R. O., Kovanci, E., Jeffres, A., Oz, U., Deren, O., Copel, J., & Mari, G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 750-756
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984024614
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70283-8
- The paper
- Bahado-Singh, R. O., Kovanci, E., Jeffres, A., Oz, U., Deren, O., Copel, J., & Mari, G. (1999). The Doppler cerebroplacental ratio and perinatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70283-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.