Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of Z‐scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography

Schneider, C., McCrindle, B. W., Carvalho, J. S., Hornberger, L. K., McCarthy, K. P., Daubeney, P. E. F.·2005·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Objectives: Z‐scores for cardiac dimensions are well established in postnatal life, but have yet to be developed for fetal cardiac dimensions. These would be of real advantage to the clinician in accurately quantifying size and growth of cardiac dimensions and to the researcher by allowing mathematical comparison of growth in differing subgroups of a disease. The purpose of this observational study, conducted at tertiary fetal medicine and cardiology units, was to produce formulae and nomograms allowing computation of Z‐scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from knowledge of femur length (FL), biparietal diameter (BPD) or gestational age (GA) using fetal echocardiography. Methods: Seventeen fetal cardiac dimensions were measured in 130 pregnant women with singleton fetuses of gestational age 15–39 weeks. Regression equations were derived relating all dimensions to FL, BPD and GA. From the calculations, formulae were then developed allowing fetal cardiac Z‐score computation. Results: The relationships between cardiac dimensions and FL, BPD or GA were described following natural log transformation. From this analysis, FL (taken as an expression of fetal size) had the highest correlation to fetal cardiac dimensions. From the developed nomograms, Z‐scores of specific fetal cardiac structures could be estimated from knowledge of the FL, BPD or GA and echocardiographically derived measurements. Conclusions: This study allowed computation of Z‐scores in fetal life for 17 cardiac dimensions from FL, BPD or GA. Previous studies of normal data allowed qualitative assessment of where abnormal cardiac dimensions lay with regard to the normal range. Z‐scores from this study allow quantitative analysis of where such dimensions lie relative to the mean. This permits exact assessment of growth of fetal cardiac structures in normal hearts and particularly in congenitally abnormal hearts where quantitative assessment of the growth of cardiac structures is important in analyzing and planning treatment strategies. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.2597

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Schneider, C., McCrindle, B. W., Carvalho, J. S., Hornberger, L. K., McCarthy, K. P., & Daubeney, P. E. F.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-27
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
599-605
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1971002858
Cited by
314
References
13
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Z‐scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/uog.2597
The paper
Schneider, C., McCrindle, B. W., Carvalho, J. S., Hornberger, L. K., McCarthy, K. P., & Daubeney, P. E. F. (2005). Development of Z‐scores for fetal cardiac dimensions from echocardiography. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2597

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.