Cited by 109Prenatal Screening and DiagnosticsCongenital Anomalies and Fetal SurgeryFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

The 11–13-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis

Open access
Kagan, K. O., Staboulidou, I., Syngelaki, A., Cruz, J., Nicolaides, K. H.·2010·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and outcome of fetuses with holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis diagnosed at 11-13 weeks of gestation. METHODS: As part of a prospective screening study for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation, transabdominal ultrasound examination was performed to diagnose holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis. Fetal karyotype and pregnancy outcome in fetuses with these defects were examined. RESULTS: Screening was carried out in 57 119 pregnancies. The prevalence of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis was 1 : 1298, 1 : 381 and 1 : 1632, respectively. Chromosomal abnormalities, mainly trisomies 18 and 13, were found in 65.9% of fetuses with holoprosencephaly, in 55.3% with exomphalos and in 31.4% with megacystis. There was spontaneous resolution of the defect by 20 weeks in 92.5% of euploid fetuses with exomphalos containing only bowel and in 90% of the euploid fetuses with megacystis and bladder length of < or = 15 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of fetuses with holoprosencephaly, exomphalos and megacystis diagnosed at 11-13 weeks of gestation are aneuploid, but in the majority of cases exomphalos and megacystis represent temporary abnormalities that resolve spontaneously.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.7646

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prevalence of megacystis was 1 in 1632, with a chromosomal abnormality detected in 31.4% of affected cases.

    “Moreover, results from a prospective study involving nearly 60,000 women showed that the prevalence of megacystis was 1 in 1632, with a chromosomal abnormality detected in 31.4% of affected cases [52].”
  • Other ultrasound findings suggestive of TS include left-sided cardiac anomalies, partial anomalous pulmonary venous return/connection and persistent left superior vena cava, renal anomalies, small omphalocele, short femur and fetal growth restriction.

    “Other ultrasound findings suggestive of TS include left-sided cardiac anomalies, partial anomalous pulmonary venous return/connection and persistent left superior vena cava, renal anomalies, small omphalocele, short femur and fetal growth restriction.45,50-54”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Copyright  2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36: 10-14. 14690705, 2010, 1, · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kagan, K. O., Staboulidou, I., Syngelaki, A., Cruz, J., & Nicolaides, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine (GB)
  • University College Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Nicolaides, K. H.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-24
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
10-14
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W1977475819
Cited by
108
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fetal Medicine Foundation (1 037 116)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
holoprosencephaly, omphalocele, megacystis, first-trimester ultrasound screening, Down syndrome, fetal aneuploidy, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, spontaneous resolution, fetal karyotype, pregnancy outcomes, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Urinary Bladder, Down Syndrome, Female, Gestational Age, Hernia, Umbilical, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Remission, Spontaneous, Prevalence, Holoprosencephaly, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review