The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Status and trends of dam removal research in the United States
Abstract
Aging infrastructure coupled with growing interest in river restoration has driven a dramatic increase in the practice of dam removal. With this increase, there has been a proliferation of studies that assess the physical and ecological responses of rivers to these removals. As more dams are considered for removal, scientific information from these dam‐removal studies will increasingly be called upon to inform decisions about whether, and how best, to bring down dams. This raises a critical question: what is the current state of dam‐removal science in the United States? To explore the status, trends, and characteristics of dam‐removal research in the U.S., we searched the scientific literature and extracted basic information from studies on dam removal. Our literature review illustrates that although over 1200 dams have been removed in the U.S., fewer than 10% have been scientifically evaluated, and most of these studies were short in duration (<4 years) and had limited (1–2 years) or no pre‐removal monitoring. The majority of studies focused on hydrologic and geomorphic responses to removal rather than biological and water‐quality responses, and few studies were published on linkages between physical and ecological components. Our review illustrates the need for long‐term, multidisciplinary case studies, with robust study designs, in order to anticipate the effects of dam removal and inform future decision making. WIREs Water 2017, 4:e1164. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1164 This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water Water and Life > Stresses and Pressures on Ecosystems
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Removal of dams is an increasingly important issue in Europe and in the USA [90], but not yet in the Global South, where a”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
Citations
Cites
Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomicsPreprint
Krzywinski, M. I., Schein, J. E., Birol, İ., Connors, J. M., Gascoyne, R. D., Horsman, D. E., Jones, S. J. M., & Marra, M. A. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109 · Cited by 11,073
A global boom in hydropower dam construction
Zarfl, C., Lumsdon, A. E., Berlekamp, J., Tydecks, L., & Tockner, K. (2015) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0 · Cited by 2,181
Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts
Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C., Follstad-Shah, J., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1109769 · Cited by 1,903
The Importance of Land-Use Legacies to Ecology and Conservation
FOSTER, D., SWANSON, F., ABER, J., BURKE, I., BROKAW, N., TILMAN, D., & KNAPP, A. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0077:tiolul]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,213
Allan, J. D., & Castillo, M. M. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5583-6 · Cited by 940
How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal
Poff, N. L., & Hart, D. D. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0659:hdvawi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 846
Process-based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems
Beechie, T. J., Sear, D., Olden, J. D., Pess, G. R., Buffington, J. M., Moir, H. J., Roni, P., & Pollock, M. M. (2010) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.7 · Cited by 789
The science and practice of river restoration
Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2014wr016874 · Cited by 770
The science and application of ecological monitoring
Lindenmayer, D. B., & Likens, G. E. (2010) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.013 · Cited by 730
Underwood, A. (1991) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf9910569 · Cited by 670
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Heinz Center, 2002, Dam Removal Science and Decision Making
- Ward JW, 1983, The serial discontinuity concept of lotic systems, Dyn Lotic Ecosyst, 10, 29
- Graf WL, 2003, Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects
- McCullough D, 1968, The Johnstown Flood: The Incredible Story Behind One of the Most Devastating Disasters America Has Ever Known
- 10.1017/CBO9780511542015 · DOI · Paper page
- Pohl MM, 2003, Dam Removal Research: Status and Prospects, 29
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity
Reid, A. J., Carlson, A. K., Creed, I. F., Eliason, E. J., Gell, P. A., Johnson, P. T. J., Kidd, K. A., MacCormack, T. J., Olden, J. D., Ormerod, S. J., et al. (2019) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12480 · Cited by 3,645
Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers
Best, J. (2018) · Nature Geoscience · doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0262-x · Cited by 1,391
River dam impacts on biogeochemical cycling
Maavara, T., Chen, Q., Meter, K. J. V., Brown, L. E., Zhang, J., Ni, J., & Zarfl, C. (2020) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-019-0019-0 · Cited by 850
Global proliferation of small hydropower plants – science and policy
Couto, T. B. A., & Olden, J. D. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.1746 · Cited by 424
Foley, M., Bellmore, J., O'Connor, J., Duda, J., East, A., Grant, G., Anderson, C., Bountry, J., Collins, M., Connolly, P., et al. (2017) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1002/2017wr020457 · Cited by 208
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ryan Bellmore, J., Duda, J. J., Craig, L. S., Greene, S. L., Torgersen, C. E., Collins, M. J., & Vittum, K.
- Affiliations
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station Juneau AK USA
- Western Fisheries Research Center (US)
- American Rivers (US)
- Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center (US)
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Venue
- WIREs Water
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-09-05
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2049-1948 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2517340568
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey's John Wesley Powell Center for Analysis and Synthesis
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Dam Engineering and Safety
- Keywords
- dam removal, river restoration, aging infrastructure, long-term monitoring, hydrological response, geomorphic response, ecological responses, water quality, research design, research gaps, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
