A scoping review of the green parenthood effect on environmental and climate engagement
Open accessAbstract
We review the existing literature on the role of parenthood as a motivator of environmental engagement (the green parenthood effect), focusing particularly on climate change. We find that parenthood is severely understudied as a mechanism that may influence climate change‐relevant behavior. The literature on the role of parenthood in driving environmental engagement is mixed, due in part to the role of baseline individual and group characteristics that lead to different impacts of parenthood on environmental engagement as well as to the countervailing impact of intense time and budget constraints imposed by parenthood. Some studies suggest that parenthood increases pro‐environmental engagements, while others find no effects or negative effects. We theorize that potential mediators and moderators need to be taken into account to get a clearer picture of how parenthood influences pro‐environmental engagement. We highlight underlying proposed mechanisms that might be activated during the transition to parenthood (i.e., legacy motives, generativity, perceived responsibility), potential moderators of the green parenthood effect, and insights for public engagement. This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Global Justice Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Social Amplification/Attenuation of Climate Risks Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Social Movements
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors and an attitudinal shift from anthropocentric to ecocentric.
“Ecological. Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors, ranging from recycling to engaging in political protests (44–46). They may also report an attitudinal shift, from anthropocentric to ecocentric, developing an aversion to overconsumption and a desire for a deeper connection with nature and all living beings in a reciprocal relationship (47).”
From A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000006155 · Cited by 2,974 · see citing works
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162 · see citing works
Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults
McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221 · Cited by 614 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Although generativity is thought to be a psychological phenomenon present across different stages of life, there is some evidence to suggest that it is more salient in midlife (McAdams et al., 1993; Newton & Stewart, 2010) and later stages of life (Gruenewald et al.”
BackgroundThe impact of place and legacy framing on climate action: A lifespan approach
Wickersham, R. H., Zaval, L., Pachana, N. A., & Smyer, M. A. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228963 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical need for the concept of matrescence in perinatal psychiatry
Athan, A. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1364845 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shrum, T. R., Platt, N. S., Markowitz, E., & Syropoulos, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Vermont (US)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shrum, Trisha R.
- Venue
- WIREs Climate Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-01-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-7799
- OpenAlex
- W4317814854
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 13.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- KR Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- parenthood, environmental engagement, climate change engagement, pro-environmental behavior, generativity, perceived responsibility, time and budget constraints, citizen participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review