Cited by 51Environmental Education and SustainabilityClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFamily Dynamics and Relationships

A scoping review of the green parenthood effect on environmental and climate engagement

Open access
Shrum, Trisha R., Platt, Natalie S., Markowitz, Ezra, Syropoulos, Stylianos·2023·WIREs Climate Change

Abstract

We review the existing literature on the role of parenthood as a motivator of environmental engagement (the green parenthood effect), focusing particularly on climate change. We find that parenthood is severely understudied as a mechanism that may influence climate change‐relevant behavior. The literature on the role of parenthood in driving environmental engagement is mixed, due in part to the role of baseline individual and group characteristics that lead to different impacts of parenthood on environmental engagement as well as to the countervailing impact of intense time and budget constraints imposed by parenthood. Some studies suggest that parenthood increases pro‐environmental engagements, while others find no effects or negative effects. We theorize that potential mediators and moderators need to be taken into account to get a clearer picture of how parenthood influences pro‐environmental engagement. We highlight underlying proposed mechanisms that might be activated during the transition to parenthood (i.e., legacy motives, generativity, perceived responsibility), potential moderators of the green parenthood effect, and insights for public engagement. This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Global Justice Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Social Amplification/Attenuation of Climate Risks Perceptions, Behavior, and Communication of Climate Change > Behavior Change and Responses The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Social Movements

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcc.818

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors and an attitudinal shift from anthropocentric to ecocentric.

    “Ecological. Climate change may drive mothers to adopt environmentally conscious behaviors, ranging from recycling to engaging in political protests (44–46). They may also report an attitudinal shift, from anthropocentric to ecocentric, developing an aversion to overconsumption and a desire for a deeper connection with nature and all living beings in a reciprocal relationship (47).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shrum, T. R., Platt, N. S., Markowitz, E., & Syropoulos, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Vermont (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Shrum, Trisha R.
Venue
WIREs Climate Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-01-23
Volume
14
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1757-7780 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-7799
OpenAlex
W4317814854
Cited by
51
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7
FWCI
13.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
KR Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
parenthood, environmental engagement, climate change engagement, pro-environmental behavior, generativity, perceived responsibility, time and budget constraints, citizen participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review